Linkage: 12 January 2016 #TheTriggering
The vast majority of modern women in the West are irreparably corrupt. And while many of us blame the toxic influence of feminism, I believe that feminism is merely a symptom of a decadent society rather than the disease itself.
Even without feminism, there are aspects of our society that lure and corrupt women with disastrous consequences for the society as a whole. It starts with the creation of snarky and entitled women who place their careers and riding the cock carousel above being wives and mothers, which leads to dysfunctional matrimonial relationships, which leads to divorce and men shunning marriage.
This then leads to the destruction of nuclear families, which leads to the decline in population due to low birth-rates, which in turn makes governments resort to importing millions of foreign immigrants to replace the native population, and also all the consequences for the children being raised by single mothers, and so on.
The following are the biggest offenders that are currently corrupting women today:
It is no secret that many criminals are visceral creatures; they operate based off of primal impulses and desires. Thus, it makes sense that certain external stimuli which change your basic biology could thwart crime, does it not?
Well, in 2003 London city officials started playing classical music at several train stations; the results were startling. After just 18 months, robberies had dropped by 30%, assaults on staff by 25%, and vandalism by a whopping 37%. Likewise, Portland implemented a similar strategy in a high-crime rail station; police station calls dropped by a massive 40%.
If these attacks are indeed centrally organized, they are a game changer. In the Arab world, there is no greater dishonor to a man than when a woman under his protection is violated. The shame is so great that men will kill their daughters or nieces, or force them to marry their rapists, in order to regain face. So when men from a culture that kills its violated women engage in mass sexual assaults, all at the same time in different countries, this can only be seen as a declaration of war. Systematic rape has long been used as a weapon of war and as a tool for ethnic cleansing. And now Europe finds itself invaded by hundreds of thousands of military age men, invited by its leaders, who rape and pillage as if they already conquered the continent.
As an act of terror, the mass sexual assault on that New Year’s Eve in Europe is different, as it is an attack on the women, daughters and nieces of Europe. Every man knows girls of that age, and every European man was already familiar with the groups of Middle Eastern hyenas prowling the streets and bothering girls. When European girls are attacked in an organized mass assault, this more than anything feels like an attack on our closest, most intimate tribe. It triggers our most primal instincts.
“Fantastic,” “love it,” “I’ll sign for you, guys”: Future presidents, lawyers and devoted human rights defenders at Yale offered their backing to a prankster’s petition to repeal the First Amendment. It protects freedom of speech, the press and religion.
US political satirist and filmmaker Ami Horowitz approached the students at one of the most prestigious universities in the world asking its attendees to sign a petition in favor of repealing the First Amendment.
“I think it is fantastic. I absolutely agree,” said one guy, while another commented: “I appreciate what you are trying to do.”
However, the group’s actions totally contradict the above statement. Anonymous has an extremely defined philosophy and group mentality, especially in recent years that completely “operates on directives.” They were a clear presence at Occupy Wall Street. They also cyber attacked many police stations before due process was completed on the cases.
The group functions on the whims of the mass media and large government. One would go as far as to speculate that large government and media might fund Anonymous. Though a minor threat, the group also deems who is allowed to have the “right” ideas and the “wrong” ideas, as in the most recent incident with Trump illustrates.
We’ve been told that women have never been better; that they are the strongest and most empowered in human history. We’ve been told that they can “do it all,” while they’ve been told that they can “have it all.” We’ve been told that we have the best women the world has ever produced; that we’re surrounded by a group of pipe-swinging bad-ass bitches who make tons of money, raise great children, and maintain tip-top homes.
Everyday, the media reminds us of these “superwomen,” and they’ll remind us of it again tomorrow. We’re told that these almighty goddesses should be celebrated, and that we should feel privileged to share the earth them.
But what did we get in reality? Well, sadly, what we got is what we have: a bunch of drugged up flunkies who can’t even organize a healthy morning shit, never mind organize their own lives or the lives of anyone else. We are a generation of men that has been completely misled, ripped off, and screwed over—and there are no refunds. All we can do is keep trudging through the wasteland, and hope for the best.
Many people have pointed to the collapsing birthrate in Western societies and questioned why middle-class young women aren’t having children at the same rates as their mothers and grandmothers. Some people have pointed to factors including careerism, feminism, and an orchestrated plan directed by the elite. This article will discuss why the system wants women to see motherhood as a low-status pursuit.
. . . . .
I’m sure that when a career woman is on her deathbed, her last thoughts will revolve around whether she reached the highest levels of the career ladder and made her bosses and shareholders enough money. Certainly she won’t think of their husband, children, or grandchildren—that’s nothing compared to the fulfillment won by spending time in soul-sucking meetings with people she hates.
Know that we are living in a modern society where most other people you encounter are complete strangers whom you know nothing about. It is understandable to protect and save someone you know and care for, but there is no reason for you to jump in and be the knight in shinning armor to save some nameless person just because she happens to lack a Y chromosome.
Of course, it all depends on the specific situation you are faced with. But if you find yourself habitually white-knighting for women, here are 7 reasons to pause and reconsider your motives and what you’re getting yourself into.
Women not connected to a machine gave these answers:
Age at first intercourse: 16.36
Number of sexual partners: 2.70
Number of one-time sexual partners: 0.82
Women connected to a lie detector gave these answers:
Age at first intercourse: 16.15
Number of sexual partners: 3.35
Number of one-time sexual partners: 1.01
As we can see, women’s numbers increase for each answer when they were connected to a lie detector. In fact, women have 41% more sexual partners than men. Men in the lie detector condition reported having 1.96 partners on average compared to 3.35 partners for women. Feminists claim that women are sexually oppressed and shamed by society, but the numbers don’t show it.
The media would never write about a woman who takes care of her family without fanfare or glory.
But a duck-faced woman who gets drunk and abandons her son for five years, then returning to motherhood by stealing his allowance money, is a hero.
The War Against Men is real.
Always look for the story behind the story.
Courtesy of reader chris, a large (and growing) reference list of studies finding strong and accumulating evidence for the Chateau Heartiste maxim that Diversit + Proximity = War by Various Means.
Feel free to link to this post on social media platforms or drop it in a clown world combox whenever a shitlib smugly wanders into your shitlord kill zone, begging for a hail of hot Realtalk™. Pounding an equalist dingbat over the head with real world events happening right before his eyes that contradict his religious teachings doesn’t work as well as pounding him over the head with peer reviewed SCIENCE!, for nothing flatters the shitlib ego as much as his carefully manicured belief that he is on the side of science. And nothing pleases yer ‘umble Destroyer of Ids more than witnessing the exact moment when a shitlib’s ego is rent in two.
If a group of people came in and destroyed your country, destroyed your family, destroyed your life, and stole your future, your natural, mentally healthy reaction would be simple – revenge. You would hunt those people down and kill them. Unfortunately it wasn’t some roving band of post-apocalyptic bandits that did this to you, it was the electorate of the United States. And unfortunately this electorate did it legally under a democracy.
Since this is a democracy, no matter how much damage the electorate causes, you have no recourse. It doesn’t matter that it’s unlikely you’ll ever have a successful career, it doesn’t matter that it’s nearly impossible to start a family, it doesn’t matter you have no future. By living in a democracy you agree to accept majority rule for better or worse. Ideally this rule would be “better.” The electorate figures things out, puts 2 and 2 together, and inevitably comes to the logical conclusion a minimal state and maximum freedom is the ideal form of government. But as evidenced recently, the electorate is impaired, it’s ignorant, it’s naïve, and it’s brainwashed. Consequently, the people not only get the government they deserve, the minority gets to unjustly suffer the consequences.
Linkage: 12 January 2016 #TheTriggering — No Comments
HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>