Here’s the thing gents—the sexual market place is a cold, wild, barren and unfriendly place. When you interact with strangers (as the girls that you meet through pick-up inevitably are) then you run the risk of playing with emotional fire. Remember, everyone is out for what they can get, you included. You want to meet and sleep with the hottest girl that your SMV will afford.
But girls have an agenda too. They also want to meet the ‘hottest’ guy that they can get—it’s just in their case the definition of ‘hot’ might expand to encompass things like status, influence, wealth or even ‘bad boy’ indicators.
You may have been in the frame for that hour you spent talking to her and making out with her in the club, but be in no doubt that she has other options, other guys blowing up her phone asking for a date. Now, that’s not to say that a clever piece of ‘text game’—a smart quip or cocky-funny line—could never help in such a situation. It is just possible that, delivered correctly, such a line could indeed prompt her reappraisal of you and make you a contender once more. But realise that the cards are stacked against you and that such a turnaround is unlikely.
I’ve explained to you fucking idiots that Democrats will vote for anyone the Democrat party runs for President. Including a dead person. You think I’m making this shit up because you are stupid.
Following up a Donald Trump assassination joke on Saturday, liberal talk show host Bill Maher said Monday that he would rather vote for a “dead” Hillary Clinton over her Republican challenger Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.
The far left used to have some substance, backbone, and panache. Even the most far-out Trotskyist wouldn’t dream of sinking to that level of blathering depravity. Many Jacobins were fruitcakes, but they were up in arms about real problems. They set up barricades and fought for what they believed in. The Chinese Communists trekked 5,600 miles through rugged terrain on their Long March. The thought never crossed their minds to try to take over China by bellyaching. The Viet Cong would stop at nothing. They’d fight even vastly outnumbered, carrying on even if they had to hide out in dark tunnels for days while suffering from dysentery.
These social justice weenies, though, are simply big babies with no understanding of logic or proportion. If Leonid Brezhnev were still around, those losers would make him sick.
The idea of a group of Feminists who identify as witches may sound absurd, but I assure you, they are very much serious.
Before we start of, let me read the group’s description for you:
“We are a collective of queer witches diverse in age, nationality, gender, race, class, ability & more. To strive for a better community for everyone we must acknowledge how privileges and oppression intersect across these labels.
We are committing to forming an anti-oppressive/ethical space. As such, we actively combat forms of oppression – including, but not limited to, racism, ableism, sexism, cissexism, classism, colourism, casteism, etc.”
The group, which describes itself as “A safe space for witches who identify as trans/queer”, was founded by Dakota Bracciale:
I used to think dating across the political aisle was not only possible, but practical. Hell, if James Carville and Mary Matalin can get along, I can date someone who thinks my genitals automatically give me privileges that they don’t have, right?
People who are more loyal to their gender and not their significant other don’t make good partners.
They will always look at you as inherently more fortunate than them. They’ve bought into the “battle of the sexes” mentality and it often pervades their perceptions of romance. Romance turns into a power struggle rather than a partnership.
Several months ago, in January, someone on my friend list posted a link to an otherkin Facebook group that he had discovered. The post was a call to arms for people to join the group en mass and start trolling. Within minutes, the group which had just a little over 200 members at the time, quickly rose to well over 1,000 members. The group was spammed with hundreds of satirical and troll posts in a period of just 2 days, with people claiming to be “Hitlerkin”, “Stalinkin” and several other made up otherkin-type identities. The “I identify as an attack helicopter“ copy-pasta was posted in there at least once every 5 minutes.
There’s a closed group on Facebook called “Mommy wars”, a group that currently has over 23,000 members. The group was created for the wives of Military men to give each other advice, to interact with each other and to offer support where it is needed.
The Group’s description reads:
“We 99.99999% just don’t give a fuck.
This isn’t the place for your sanctimonious opinions. We have a group for that. Please join Sanctimommy Wars for your parenting debates.
. . . . .
The story begins with a stay at home mom coming to the group for advice. Her husband is away on Military duty, and she wants to know whether its a good idea to cheat or not.
A woman freaks out after a random guy says hello to her.
He didn’t catcall her, he didn’t whistle at her, all he said was HELLO.
Now here’s the really funny part: She uploaded the video to YouTube herself, because she actually thought she was in the right here. If you really want to get your mind fucked, I suggest watching the full video she uploaded below:
The primary goal of every human being is self improvement and progress in life. Unless you are a nihilist or a sociopath, nobody wakes up in the morning asking themselves how they can make their lives worse off or more strenuous.
After improving our own lives, the next step is to improve the lives of our children and future generations to come. If you grew up in orphanages your whole life, you do your best to build a caring home for your children so they will grow up in a better environment than you did. If you had to work as a stripper in your teenage years to make ends meet, you make sure that your children do not go through the same hardship. If you were born into poverty, you try to get rich, so your children can live the quality of life you were denied.
So why exactly do we vilify people for being born into rich homes? Isn’t that everyone’s goal in life? To improve the lives of our children and make sure that they live fulfilling and entertaining lives? And then when someone actually succeeds, we vilify him? For attaining what everyone else wants to attain?
I read newspapers to get knowledge but I didn’t understand that some media outlets were skewed left while others were skewed to the right. So I would read The Guardian and The Australian and scratch my head wondering why nothing seemed to add up. But nobody told me about this stuff. Perhaps they simply assumed that I knew what they knew. This is a common mistake. Soundbites, all I had was soundbites.
But I did have an inbuilt bullshit-detector. I just hadn’t yet cranked the dial up to eleven. The first occurrences that really made me scratch my head were when I encountered people who were supposed to be incredibly intelligent but who said really stupid things. People like professors and doctors and lawyers.
It was a gigantic revelation to come to the understanding that intelligent people could be stupid.
Once this veil was lifted I began to notice how many stupid people were around me. There were a lot. More than I had ever thought possible.
I began to notice that the stupid people always had the same opinions. This was back when I didn’t understand the difference between an opinion and a soundbite. I also observed that the stupid people would cling to their soundbites in the face of all available evidence. Not only that, but they would mercilessly mock others who changed their thoughts on a subject when encountering new evidence. To the stupid people this was the worst thing possible. A stupid person who became less stupid by obtaining new evidence and furthering his knowledge was labeled a heretic.
Bayer, the pharmaceutical giant that rakes in roughly $47 billion dollars a year, recently acquired Monsanto for a whopping $66 billion dollars.
My friends, I do not speak frivolously when I say that this could potentially be one of the most devastating acquisitions for human health of this century.
Monsanto is widely known as one of the most evil companies in the world—for reasons which I will soon discuss, however this is not what concerns me. What concerns me is that Monsanto owns a whopping 90% market share on soy and corn, which is used in virtually everything in the US (high fructose corn syrup or soy protein anyone?). Monsanto owns a gigantic 26% share of the seed market as well, which sets them ahead of all other competitors.
Coming in at 19%, Bayer owns the most share of the pesticide market out of anyone. It is not these gigantic market shares, however, that scare me. It is the fact that if one company owns a monopoly in BOTH the seed industry AND the pesticide industry, they could effectively force farmers to grow GMO’s which have been shown to have a plethora of devastating ecological and human health consequences.
Before I delve into the disturbing economic and health-related ramifications of this new acquisition, I would first like to shed some light on the complete lack of ethics that these companies exhibit.
Diversity fails because it combines groups with conflicting directions of self-interest. Each group needs its own standards, culture and pride, which is formed of knowledge that their civilization was created by them and designed for them and will always be controlled by them.
However, the liberal ideology of egalitarianism requires proof because it is conjectural, which means that any working example of non-egalitarian social organization is a threat which must be destroyed. For this reason, Leftists cram together different groups whenever possible to try to “prove” that diversity works.
While those in power can force this to happen, the inevitable occurs: members of these different groups have different opinions, and start to find the other groups offensive because they act in ways that contradict or offend the values of one or more groups. At that point, the diversity acolytes must turn to segregation.
. . . . .
Exclusion is one of the fundamental rights of territory, which is property owned or controlled by a group. For an ethnic group to have its own standards and values, it must exclude all others.
While the special snowflakes in their ISSs are mostly hoping to avoid ideas, ADSSs are succeeding by protecting each group and giving it a sense of pride in its own identity. This threatens the goal of globalism, which is to abolish borders so that it can unite the world into a single ideological and economic space.