Both are based on hateful ideologies that identify their targets as an enemy to be destroyed.
Both paint themselves as victims of oppression who are simply resisting against the oppressor.
Both seek to advance the power of their own group at the expense of all others.
Both seek public attention through their attacks and other outlandish displays.
Both are made up of members who are angry, bitter, delusional, and unhappy with their lives.
Both need a scapegoat to blame all their personal problems and failures on.
Both engage in terror tactics both as a retaliation and as means of advancing their political agendas.
Both want their victims to cower in fear and paranoia.
Both seek reaction from their targets as a way of stoking the flames of war between the two groups.
As you can see, feminism is no different from many different types of terrorist organizations around the world—except in one special way: their modus operandi. You must understand that the feminist terror tactics we face today are not the same as the standard terror tactics that we are familiar with. Feminist terrorism contrasts itself through its feminine nature compared to the conventional, masculine form of terrorism.
The confusion you have is how can a charlatan like Trump just come in and whisk away the vote. How can somebody with a very grey business back ground, not to mention crass and lewd demeanor, present such a threat to the establishment Republican party.
You need to realize the problem is not with Trump, but that it is with you. YOU are the problem. YOU are the ones who failed. You are so corrupt, but more so, inept and cowardly that the real Americans would rather vote for a potty-mouthed, straight shooter, than any of the “Slop v. 3.0” you’re going to serve up this round.
I know most of you purport to espouse “free market” ideals. Perhaps you should for once follow those ideals and listen to the customers and deliver what they want.
Oh, wait, that’s right. You’re a political party no better than the democrats.
Guess we’re just going to have to replace you.
The 17th annual White Privilege Conference in Philadelphia devolved into a precious snowflake whinefest when attendees noted that the conference was too white. No, I’m not kidding. To make things more absurd, a speaker, who was Caucasian, spoke over his allotted time, an offense that was nothing more than an exercise in white supremacy. The Daily Caller was there to capture these precious snowflakes engaging in pervasive nonsense over what was probably an excruciating three-day (April 15-17) excursion:
Adults may soon find their sex lives regulated to the point where nearly every sexual encounter is defined as rape unless neither party reports the activity.
The American Law Institute will vote in May on whether to adopt a model penal code that would make “affirmative consent” the official position of the organization. Affirmative consent — or “yes means yes” — policies have already been adopted by many colleges and universities, and have been passed as law in California and New York.
A source within ALI has confirmed to the Washington Examiner that the model penal code on sexual assault that was discussed at last year’s meeting will be voted on at their annual meeting this coming May. Last year, the draft proposal was met with opposition from ALI members, including a female former prosecutor who called the draft “really disturbing.”
A group of concerned members within ALI even circulated an opposition letter, signed by dozens of members, that detailed the dangers of pushing affirmative consent on the general public (not that it’s a good policy for college students, either).
5. “Women cooperate better!”
As said before, it only seems this way, because with men there is more direct conflict. Women only seem to cooperate better, because they never attack one another in the open. In reality, they let bitterness and grudges fester and never confront one another about it. They simply resort to petty passive aggressive tactics, emotional warfare, and manipulative techniques to harm their enemies.
At least with men, when there is a problem, they confront one another about it and it’s very clear who stands where. With women, you never know who stands where, and nothing ever gets done, because everyone is passive aggressively hindering one another.
You have to remember that an individual woman doesn’t care about the cost to the society (which she feels entitled to), the culture (which she feels should cater to all her needs), the sanctity of marriage and family (which she considers oppressive or getting in the way of her career), or even her own long-term personal health and happiness. For today’s young Western woman, all that matters is the fleeting pleasure, the youthful excitement, and what she feels is right—at that moment in time.
With their superior ability to rationalize their own misconducts, women rarely think about the future consequences. For this reason, our ancestors knew better and decided that it would be best to control women’s behaviour instead of allowing them to corrode the moral fabric of society. Any woman who reads this will do well for herself by maintaining her health, chastity, and femininity for a man who would be worthy of being her husband.
Here’s a personal anecdote: There was one woman I met who lived a life of adventure when she was young, and she told me how she had cheated on her boyfriends multiple times. She is still not married and now lives with depression and painful regrets—she just can’t seem to piece her shattered self-esteem back together. She had been kind to me, so I felt sorry for her pain, but there was nothing I could do to help her. So, ladies, if you don’t want to listen to some online “misogynist“—and assuming that you’re not a psychopath incapable of remorse and human bonding—at least try to remember her.
Newly published research finds women view men as more attractive potential long-term mates if they are good storytellers.
“Stories are not just mere conversation,” write Melanie Green of the University of Buffalo and John Donahue of the University of North Carolina. “Storytelling ability appears to increase (a man’s) perceived status, and thus helps men attract long-term partners.”
In the biggest picture, the loss of American women’s femininity is exactly what one would expect to see in a culture that is unmooring from its historical K-selected, predominantly White biomechanical foundation (patriarchal, high paternity certainty, slender women with low cock counts) and drifting toward an r-selected, increasingly nonWhite society (matriarchal, low paternity certainty, muscular and obese women with high cock counts) similar to the African sexual market norm, (where men more than anywhere else in the world are “dancing monkeys” for women and the women toil in the fields and bring home the bacon while crapping out kids from behind-the-bush trysts with multiple fathers).
When men’s sexuality is maximally restricted, and women’s sexuality is released of all constraints, the inevitable result is a dispiritingly corporate romantic market of supplicating male lackeys and aggro “slut positive” careergrrl chubsters whose very financial independence (government gibsmedats by any name) obviates the need to be more pleasing and feminine to attract beta male providers with tight resource sharing Game.