Linkage: 27 February, 2018 #TheTriggering
Now take those four things;
and take their COMPLETE OPPOSITE
and that my friends is your average sports fan.
A person who is;
Stupid (or horrifically conformistly average)
Has no point or purpose in life
And is easily susceptible, if not perfectly susceptible to indoctrination, brainwashing, and conditioning.
. . . . .
But to truly understand why sports fans are such idiots, particularly when they are violent or ecstatic when “their” team wins or loses, it’s key to realize what is truly driving their irrational emotion, be it anger or happiness. It’s because they have absolutely nothing else going on in their lives.
They have NOTHING of value in their lives. Their lives are so void of meaning and purpose they fill this hole with the athletic performance of other people who have nothing to do with them and don’t even know these people exist.
You may not comprehend why a guy cries when the Chicago Cubs win a world series, but that is his second coming of Jesus. You may not understand why a guy screams at a television (often times destroying it) because his team didn’t toss the sphere into the ring, but that is his entire life.
You cannot view sports fans from the perspective of reason and rationality. You must view them from the perspective of the absolute lack of anything of value going on in their lives. And if you do you see why their otherwise sad, pathetic, and irrational behavior makes sense.
The mission of Colorado ManREACH is to build heart-centered connections and community among gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer men.
Since 2004, we have provided healthy social and recreation options, such as:
· Gatherings: Multi-day events in a natural setting, with lodging in cabins or camping, delicious meals, and a rich program of activities
· Potluck Heart Circles: ManREACH community members host a potluck meal, a Heart Circle (also known as talking circle or council) and other activities, such as a hike or film
· Virtual Heart Circles: We use video conference technology to bring together men across Colorado
· Men’s Forums: Featured speakers discuss men’s health topics with members via interactive video
It’s quite true that there is empirical data that shows women were less unhappy in the 1950’s and prior, before feminism. However, conservatives often mix the word “happy” with “less unhappy.” Those are two different things. Based on the data I’ve read, I don’t see any indication that women were “happy” in the 1950’s as housewife-slaves. Yes, they were less unhappy than they are now in our new left-wing, empowered-woman, single-mother, welfare-state world, that’s very true. But less unhappy doesn’t mean happy. It just means less miserable. I’m quite confident married women in the 1950’s weren’t “happy” either.
Let’s see if the science agrees with me. To quote again from the study in the article:
married women are often more likely to develop depression
HA HA! Exactly. No, my conservative right-wing traditionalist friends, traditional marriage doesn’t make women happy. It might make you happy, but it won’t make her happy.
What have I been saying for almost ten years? Women love getting married, women hate being married. Getting married is the greatest day of a woman’s life, literally. Being married (particularly the traditional monogamous type), once the honeymoon period dies down, is a long, boring slog of work and massive sacrifice. Women HATE being married.
Women initiate 70-80% of divorces, folks. Clearly women don’t like marriage, and clearly marriage doesn’t make women happy.
We read all the time about how western (millennial) society has become overly PC (politically correct), but I would argue that we are overly female correct. When women are afforded unchecked power their first imperative is controlling men to accommodate the Feminine Imperative. Women’s Hypergamous interests influence and dictate legislation and political discourse. It may not be something most men want to consider. Most guys in the sphere are only focusing on women they know personally, but there is a larger social narrative that is inspired by women optimizing Hypergamy.
. . . . .
Women aren’t slaves to Hypergamy
This is one more question of women’s agency. Just as hypoagency and the biological element of Hypergamy can be used to socially absolve women of the responsibilities of it, so too can women’s awareness of their own Hypergamy be another way to excuse bad behavior. Again, it’s about personal responsibility. I’ve never stated that women are “slaves” to Hypergamy. I have explored women’s conscious awareness of their behaviors being influenced by their innate Hypergamy. Most women don’t realize they are giving a guy a shit test, it’s part of their limbic subroutines. Most women don’t consciously plan their girls’ night out around the proliferative phase of their menstrual cycle. They largely do, but they don’t realize the coordination.
Women aren’t slaves to Hypergamy, but they aren’t immune to its subconscious influence, and this applies to your “good girl”, your trad-con “Red Pill” woman and your “Quality Woman”.
Another safe space for womynz to backstabe each other. No one hates women like women hate women. How adorable.
Making friends as an adult is hard! Making business connections can be intimidating!
But, making time for yourself to SHINE is important!
We are a group of women from all walks of life, coming together to:
“Spread Happiness! Inspire, Network, and Elevate!”
Join us for low-key networking events where we will share or visions, our “WHY” we do what we do, learn about each other not just from a business standpoint but also that woman behind the successes and lessons! We all have a story to share, a mission to fulfill, and a legacy to build. So let’s help one another grow ourselves and our communities!
As an anarchist I have to listen to the same whinning from all the idiots all the time. Yes, it’s often about the roads. And it’s often about the police and the fantasy that the police protect people.
Fact: The police don’t care about you if their lives are going to be in danger.
Fact: Expecting the police to protect you in exchange for being paid with stollen money (taxes) is simply outsourcing your own defense to other people.
Fact: If you aren’t willing to provide for your own defense, or the defense of your children, you and your children should be extinct.
If you don’t want to have to risk entering a burning building, don’t sign up to be a fireman. If you don’t want to have to dive into flooded rivers to rescue people, don’t sign up to be a whitewater rafting guide.
And if you don’t want to have to confront an armed intruder in a high school when a specific part of your job description requires you to do so, then don’t sign up to be a school cop.
I judge the individual concerned very harshly indeed. But since society has effectively eliminated the act of shame or personal contrition then I’m sure that in the future the individual concerned will be able to come up with some internal narrative supporting the notion that he was really the victim here.
I don’t care what the laws state regarding the requirement of policemen to put themselves in danger to protect the general public, because the expectation of the general public is that the police will do so. As Michael Williamson so eloquently pointed out, nobody cares if you go home safe at the end of your shift because by signing up as a cop you relieve the average citizen of the responsibility of taking the law into his own hands to protect himself.
>Women aren’t slaves to Hypergamy, but they aren’t immune to its subconscious influence, and this applies to your >“good girl”, your trad-con “Red Pill” woman and your “Quality Woman”.
TGO, the difference between hos and bros is the word “consequences”….. I wana be rich but I don’t give in to the impulse and hold up a bank – I know I might get killed or most likely do severe time as bubba’s play thing behind bars.
Hos on the other hand “just do it” – that NIKE slogan was written in heaven for them…. I’d argue with you that in the past the word “consequences” applied more equally to the sexes, the hos facing destitution / poverty / even death for chancing some extra-marital hokey pokey….. so they may not have been happier…. but they faced real consequences, unlike now where every beta limp-wrist manlet bends over to absolve them of any ground zero after-effects.
Agreed. Women have no idea of consequences. Hell, they don’t even fully understand the concept of “the future”. Considering that a man or men as a whole will rescue them from every fuckup in their lives why should they care about consequences? As you said, it wasn’t this way in the past. But now we have the Prime Directive.