Women are biologically and neurologically incapable of:
- agency of action
- moral agency
Women have been programmed by evolution to survive. Each of these traits is detrimental to survival.
The difference between man and woman: the lion fights to the death for his cubs. The lioness goes into heat when an interloper kills her cubs.
Does this mean women are innately treacherous? As a political question, maybe. But I would say as a judgment on their character, no, women are who they are: by nature maximizers of their reproductive fitness, and that means to save their valuable eggs they’ll submit to the men with the most passion for conquest. They know not what they do, iow, except how to survive in a world only superficially moved beyond its primal energies.
The answer to the Woman Question, as PA alludes, is for the men of the West to deny the interloper lions access to their lionesses. Accomplish that, and their women won’t feel compulsions to shift allegiance.
When a Muslim fondles the tits of a 10 year old girl he is fined $1000 and 10 hours of therapy. Because . . . white women in Sweden want to be raped by Muslims because the white men in Sweden are all left-wing statist sissy-boys.
If a white man looks at a 10 year old girl he is a paedophile and rapist.
White women in the United States read about Muslims raping women in Europe and rationalize it away because they want those same Muslims to come to the United States and have sex with them.
And once Hillary is in the White House the Muslims will come.