Repeat: Stating The Obvious 0134 – Anarchy would mean gangs roaming the streets and killing people. Or would it? Part 1 of 2
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
What’s in part 1?
A few follow ups on the last Stating The Obvious. Yes more about women and how their ethics and morals take second place to their desire to conform and obey. Leaving fish out in the sun because they have no compassion. “I will run over bicyclists because it says I can in the Colorado driver’s manual” because obedience and selfishness is more important than not killing.
Knowing your friends will kill you when it’s convenient for them to do so is why the truth will not “set you free”.
Watching Batman and it’s take on anarchy, or what you would call anarchy.
In an anarcho-capitalist society would “gangs of criminals lead by warlords” roam the streets and rule the world? And how would this be different that what we have now?
If the government prevents crime why do we have crime? Notice how the State shuts down the ability of people to think. What if you said “please watch my computer while I go to the bathroom” and when you came back you discovered someone had stolen your computer and so I asked you for more money. That’s the State.
We need more laws to prevent school shootings, yet killing people is already illegal. The “three laws away from perfection” fallacy.
If the State were to shut down there would be no government and no corporations.
- Who would buy tanks?
- Who would build tanks?
- Who would maintain tanks?
- Who would operate a Nimitz class aircraft carrier? (my lizard brain v. my an-cap brain)
- How would these warlords pay their men?
A species can only prey on itself when there is a State. Hobes got this exactly backwards.
Tigers don’t eat tigers. A tiger that does so will eventually be killed by the other tigers and will not be passing on his DNA. We know it would be a boy tiger not a girl tiger because women are so compassionate. And they are only good at killing their own children.
Evolution and natural selection eliminate members of a species who don’t adhere to the nature of the species. Warlords and their gangs will be killed or die off.
The State protects criminals because crime is profit fort the State. Stefan’s video about the police.
What’s in part 2?
Without crime who doesn’t make money?
- prison industrial-complex
- psychiatry industrial-complex
- therapy industrial-complex
- DUI industrial-complex
- justice industrial-complex
- police industrial-complex
- military/police supplies industrial-complex
- military industrial-complex
- TSA industrial-complex
- security & monitoring industrial-complex
- DHS industrial-complex
- anger management industrial-complex
The State creates crime by
- protecting criminals
- passing laws
If I rape a woman, who is the victim?
If I don’t wear a seat belt who is the victim?
If I shoot a rapist who goes to jail?
Public school shootings are an important part of keeping the State intact. That’s why no one wants to stop them. The State wants more of them. What would school and a school shooting look like in an an-cap society?
Stefan Molyneux videos related to today’s cast:
Microsoft Versus Netscape – An Examination of Economic Injustice – http://youtu.be/El44f6u9NUc
Circumcision, Divorce and Male Disposability – Paul Elam – http://youtu.be/gxVAr_aq1n4
Dentists Love Cavities, An Examination of Economic Monopoly – http://youtu.be/a4496w4sD8M
Repeat: Stating The Obvious 0134 – Anarchy would mean gangs roaming the streets and killing people. Or would it? Part 1 of 2 — No Comments
HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>