Some challenged me last night on Twitter to tell them the difference between the “Christian” who shot up Planned Parenthood and the Muslim who shot up a holiday celebration. That’s easy, I said. Robert Dear was being a bad Christian, while Syed Farook was being a good Muslim.
All religions are not the same nor are they morally equivalent, and it’s mind-numbingly stupid and suicidal to believe otherwise. Christianity teaches Christians to love their enemies, while Islam teaches Muslims to cut the heads off theirs.
President Obama, of course, was quick to blame guns (all of which in this case were legally purchased) and to say the solution is to do something about guns. No, Mr. President, the problem is not guns. The problem is Islam, and the solution is to do something about Islam. The key is not getting control of guns, it’s getting control of Islam. That’s not Islamophobia, it’s Islamorealism.
On the terrorist attack of September 11th 2001 I was still living in Egypt (80 million people in this time). 19 Muslim hijackers killed 3000 innocent Americans by their own hands. Almost 80 million Muslim Egyptians following the attacks were celebrating the death of those American victims: All public transport was free this day and for the next three days all the restaurants offered free meals and sweets. All the cinemas and gardens offered free entry, the radio stations didn’t stop playing happy victory songs….Does this mean that only 19 hijackers were “extremists” while the 80 million Muslim Egyptians were “moderate peace loving” people? Does that mean that 80 million are “peace loving” only because they did not kill by their own hands?
You are not required to kill to be called violent or “extremist”or “radical”or “terrorist”. You can be violent, extremist, radical or terrorist even if you don’t kill with your own hands. That’s what the West is unable to understand…In Islam, there is many forms of “Jihad” other than killing in the battlefield…The vast majority of Muslims are sympathizers with terrorists. They believe in the same ideology and share their goals even if they do not hold arms themselves. That’s why this vast majority is silent and don’t show any opposition to their fellows who kill in the name of their religion.
. . . . .
A “hate speech” or an “insult” in Islam is to say something Muslims don’t like to hear or to acknowledge about their religion. This can be something they don’t want you to know about their religion, even if this thing is supported by a million proof from their “sacred” Islamic texts. For example to say the prophet of Islam was a pedophile, is considered a huge insult to Mohammed or an “Islamophobia”, despite there are many authentic “hadiths” (sacred books of words and deeds of Mohammed) witness that he “married” one of his favourite wives “Aisha” when she was 6 years old and he was 54 years old.
The truth is the left has ulterior motives for increasing the population perpetually. And it has nothing to with the unfounded concerns that “population decline is bad mmmkay?”
First, (though not leftist) companies and corporations want a perpetually increasing population so people buy more stuff. Nothing wrong with that on account purchasing and enjoying material things in life is part of goal of economics. But let’s be clear, corporations and companies don’t care if it’s sustainable in the long run or if it’s in the best financial interests of the population. This is why we have slowing economic growth, but booming debts. People are willing to borrow to pay for what they can’t afford today. This not only boosts consumer spending (which profits companies), but it slows long term economic growth because said monies are NOT going into investments. Again, though not specifically leftists, this goal has nothing to do with preventing the “horrors” of a declining population, but is merely corporations trying to beat the previous quarters EPS.
Second, very much like how the private sector needs perpetual (though unsustainable) growth to increase their profits, the entire socialist economic/government system the left has installed in the US (and west) depends on future hosts for today’s parasites. What I love the most is how the left tells people right to their face “Well we need future children to afford the social programs like social security and medicare!”
But soon, with all these baseless accusations of racism two things happen.
One, the market is flooded with so many accusations of racism, by the laws of economics each individual accusation means increasingly less. In the 1980’s if you were called a racist it meant something. But today, especially with the brainwashed, college-indoctrinated millennials blaming everything from flatulence to paper cuts on “racism” it means nothing. It has become so common to be accused of an “ism” it is now part of the American psyche and it has lost all of its sting.
Two, it exposes the accusers of their true nature. People flinging around accusations of “isms” and “ists” are not “noble, moral people trying to wipe out the scourge of bigotry, allowing for the American ideal of merit, individualism, and judging people by their accomplishments.” They are, quite frankly, despicably evil and disgusting people.
. . . . .
And so (and I want all corporate employers and HR ladies in America to know this), even though nearly every single corporate employee out there wants nothing more than to walk into his boss’ office with the HR lady in there and slash both your throats, the only thing holding them back is that they are indeed slaves to the job as they need to get out of debt. Which by default means they can’t speak their mind on the internet and tell the race whores to fuck off, and worse, must endure the childishly mockery of “diversity” and “sexual harassment training” you force upon them.
Ms. Christakis has made a “voluntary decision not to teach in the future,” according to a statement from the university on Monday. Her husband, Dr. Nicholas Christakis, a physician and a professor of sociology at Yale, will take a one-semester sabbatical, the university said.
Regardless of the reason women vote to destroy themselves and Western Civilization, it doesn’t change the fact that they just simply do. The rest of us must accept and adapt to this fact. And call it “democracy,” call it “women’s suffrage,” call it “empowerment,” it’s nothing more than a euphemism for “betrayal.” And the reason it is betrayal is because women are (disproportionately) voting for two key things that go against Western Civilization:
. . . . .
When you take the fact women are voting to undo all that men have worked for
are voting to bring in other cultures that want to kill, parasite off of, or just plain destroy Western Civilizatoin
won’t report getting raped by the enemy because “diversity”
WILL make false rape accusations against Western men because “patriarchy”
precisely how many knives do you plan to impale into the backs of Western men before they give up?
Reading doesn’t take place until you take your eyes off the page; in other words, reflection and contemplation are important cognitive processes. The four levels of reading championed by Mortimer Adler provided one with a critical thinking toolkit to assess and quite literally change the world around you.
I think it is no mean coincidence that reading happened to coincide with the rather thoughtful revolutions against the state that took place when the Enlightenment started to reduce the edifice of the church/state monopoly that had been the way of human civilization for thousands of years. The practice of “silent reading” became the transformative event in human society.
. . . . .
I don’t have a Facebook account nor will I ever but I am also inclined to a monastic predisposition for social interaction. I recharge in my own company. For those of you who use Facebook or other social connection mediums, at the end of the day, what is achieved of merit. There is a whimsical and almost masturbatory obsession with it. I experienced this with Twitter when my book editor recommended I use it as a cutting edge tool to promote by books. I quite literally had to carve out specific times I would be on it and simply not check it for large blocks of time.
I am convinced that the infatuation with screens of every type is actively disengaging humans from each other and actively diminishing people’s ability to employ critical thinking skills.
Now we come to the point where the great farce of reparations begins to take a dark and sinister turn. When all is said and done, the government owns nothing. Everything that the state possesses is first taken from its subjects. Ask for reparations from the state, and you are seeking possession of other people’s property, people who had no hand in harming your ancestors to begin with. In other words, you are seeking to perpetuate the cycle of theft and abuse that caused select groups of people to seek reparations in the first place. As always, we are inevitably worse off by involving the heavy hand of the state. Instead, we should seek to end violence and oppression, using voluntary institutions to aid disadvantaged groups in regaining societal equilibrium, and leaving past atrocities to fade into the annals of history.
First we have the character of Rey – aka Feminist Skywalker. In the originals, Luke Skywalker was a callow youth (Episode 4), who grew into a hot-tempered fool (Episode 5), before eventually becoming a seasoned warrior (Episode 6), through the tutelage of his elders (Obi Wan and Yoda), and the supportive friendship of his peers (Han Solo and Wedge Antilles). Feminist Skywalker, on the other hand, came out of the womb, already an expert on everything. Despite growing up as an orphan with no finances or support structure, she taught herself to be an expert at motorcycling, scrapping old tech, surviving independently, and fixing starships (in one scene, Han Solo relies upon her to fix the Millenium Falcon when he can’t figure it out), then – when she finds out that she’s a Jedi – she immediately “levels up” to the point where she can fight Not Darth Vader, despite never having held a lightsaber before.
Next we have Han Solo. In the originals he was a smuggler with a heart of gold. On the surface just another ne’er-do-well, flying around in his rusty Space Camaro with his hairy friend, but as the movies progressed he rose above his roguish ways to become a responsible General within the rebellion. For her part, Leia was charmed and aroused by the smuggler, but it was the General that she truly fell in love with. Since then he’s regressed, and outright degenerated. By the time Episode 7 rolls around, he’s a burned-up divorcee. Leia took half of his stuff, and he’s started hanging out with his hairy friend again. He’s gone from smuggling contraband to doing the sort of dirty, dangerous jobs that only ex-cons work, even getting people killed in the process. Instead of aging gracefully, he dresses like a teenager, flies around in a ship that was a piece of junk even when he was young, and you can easily imagine him and Chewie making sexually-suggestive remarks to the sixteen year old girl working at the McDonalds drive through.
Women, on the other hand, are completely fucked in the head in this exact same situation. They get dressed up in their best whore clothes, head out to a frat party, drink their faces off, end up in bed with some guy they wouldn’t normally touch with a ten yard pole, wake up the next morning feeling like a total slutbag and then it happens. Someone must be to blame for this. I can’t possibly have gotten shitfaced and exercised some really poor judgement. Moi? Ce n’est pas possible! I am an innocent blushing virgin with impeccable moral standards. Why, only whores get smashed and fuck random guys in a frat house, and I am not a whore so JESUS MOTHER OF GOD I WAS RAPED!
Bitch, please. You weren’t raped. You were trashed. Why is it that men are held responsible for their actions no matter what their state of inebriation, but women get a pass? It doesn’t matter if you were drunk, stripped naked, straddled the guy in your best cowgirl and fucked like a banshee. You were drunk. You can’t consent. You were raped.
What I, and all women in the West, are desperately in need of is SafeSpace™. Luckily, it turns out there is a space, available to all women, where the risk of violence, assault and sexual harassment is reduced to almost zero, and the protective benefits remain in place as long as one remains in the SafeSpace™ and abides by the rules of that space.
It’s called heterosexual marriage.
Yes, ladies, heterosexual marriage is your best protection against misogyny and violence, and if you have children, being married to the father of those children reduces the risk of violence to yourself and your children even further!