If you reject any demand made by any woman, you’re “just afraid of a strong woman.” This accusation has been repeated so many times that a substantial portion of the population actually seems to believe that men are at the very core of their being constitutionally terrified by any woman with “attitude.” There is probably some truth to this, but only to the extent that men would rather avoid the frustrating reality that no matter how strong a woman claims to be or what she says, no man or woman on earth will ever forgive a man for knocking her the fuck out. To prove they are not afraid of women, men end up giving women whatever they want, because they can’t stand up to women the way they stand up to each other.
Progressives get men to do whatever they want by manipulating our fear of being afraid. When you recognize this manipulation, you’ll begin to see it in nearly every argument appealing to men and every progressive narrative written about men. Their strategy is to portray masculine men, even men who have demonstrated courage in battle or in legitimately heroic endeavors where they have faced and overcome fear, as being driven primarily by fear and a sense of inadequacy.
. . . . .
People who have been protected all of their lives, and who have no interest in self-defense, don’t see themselves in the guardian role. They have always lived inside the perimeter, like women, children and the infirm. For the protected, the role of protection is “someone else’s job.” They feel secure because it is in their nature to trust that someone else will protect them from harm.
. . . . .
I don’t think protected progressives are afraid of violence all the time and I don’t think they realize how vulnerable they look to the rest of us. They are the pinkest, plushiest, softest of targets but they don’t think about threats because they don’t think it’s their job to deal with threats.
And they won’t, until the lights go out. When the lights go out, they’ll realize how vulnerable and helpless they’ve been their whole lives. They’ll see what we saw the whole time.
. . . . .
It takes absolutely no courage to say you’re against racism or xenophobia because there are absolutely no risks. Anti-racism, orchestrated integration, multiculturalism, pro-immigration, anti-xenophobia, anti-profiling, anti-stereotyping, “diversity is our strength”
these are all establishment ideas and default positions that are socially rewarded and affirmed. Risks only result from challenging these ideas in some way or other.
So who’s really afraid?
. . . . .
Every male employee of every major company knows he can be fired for saying something “insensitive,” or which could be possibly perceived subjectively by someone else as “sexual” or “threatening.” A tattoo client of mine was recently told by his human resources department that he was “too manly” and needed to be more “gender fluid” because his “certainty about his gender” might make those who were uncertain of their genders uncomfortable. He was asked to shave his beard and wear baggy clothes to hide his muscular frame. The Harrison Bergeron world of the Handicapper General is no longer dystopian fiction — it’s becoming dystopian fact!
But the real tragedy of going down the SJW path is that it doesn’t deliver what it promises or aspiring-SJW’s hope for:
Attention, fame, and glory with little-to-no real work.
Let’s be very clear and honest about what motivates young 13, 14, and 15 year olds to go on political crusades and 17,18, and 19 year olds to major in the liberal arts.
Fame, attention, and a shot at riches without having to do math and real work,
Their goal, even though they will vehemently deny it, is to get through life working a cake job,
secretly pining for fame and attention
why the hell else would you file lawsuits and protest at the age of 12 unless you are an attention whore (male or female)?
As Return of Kings publisher Roosh famously stated a year ago, all public rape accusations are false. Mentally unstable women such as Crystal Gail Mangum or Jackie Coakley have used false rape accusations in the past as a form of attention whoring, drawing accolades and sympathy from a left-wing media too lazy to check the facts. All the evidence points to Stoya’s accusations against James Deen being completely fake.
Learn what shit tests are and how to pass them. Learn how to tell when a woman wants to be kissed. Learn how women think so that you can better game them. Stand up for yourself. If a woman talks shit to you, don’t just cower away like a dog with its tail tucked between its legs. Be open with your sexuality; if you see a sexy woman, don’t hesitate to hit on her, tease her, and express the fact that you’re attracted to her with your body language and facial expressions.
Most importantly, however, encourage your woman to act feminine. Reward her when she is feminine, and punish her when she acts masculine (don’t take her out to dinner, don’t buy her things, express explicit verbal disapproval, or even kick her out of the house if she won’t stop).
The problem with preplanned ‘date nights’ is the same problem men experience with trying to pull a woman into his Frame by insisting she take up one of his hobbies or passions; it’s contrived and feels disingenuous to her. The point of the experience becomes about her being involved in it and not the actual doing of whatever it is you do together. The vibe becomes one of him making and controlling that experience so it becomes something pleasurable for her to participate in rather than really finding some inherent reward from it due to genuine interest.
Thus you get guys who (figuratively) take their women fishing and the event becomes more about introducing her to it than actually catching fish. Guys get so caught up in controlling unpleasant variables for her that the real experience of fishing is something entirely different. They want that woman to feel the same joy he does in doing something intrinsically rewarding to him, but the truth of it is she must come to it on her own.
So as a public service I’ve made the following list of things men no longer need to hear women’s opinions on. Please take a moment away from Instagram to jot these down:
50 Shades of Grey
The thoroughly disproven 77¢ on the dollar ‘Wage Gap’ lie
Giggling about ‘Dad Bods’ being “sexy”
Your confusion about where all the good men have gone
Red Pill Truths
‘Designer cupcakes’ and hand-baked dog treats being examples of ‘female entrepreneurship’
Christian patriarchy in an age of feminine assimilation of religion
Any sentence that begins with, “As a woman I, . . . ”
Pleas for men’s aid in advancing your feminist ideals at the United Nations after claiming not to ‘need’ men
Any form of flavored martinis (or boxed wine)
50 Shades of Grey (again)
Whether or not your feminine responsibility to engage in traditional Holiday ‘cheer’ is un-feminist
And the complete lack of ethics in all forms of journalism