Linkage: 1 March 2016 #TheTriggering
I also do not have an issue with the idea of women-only gyms, which are already popping up everywhere; the justification for this being that women feel more confident working out in a woman-only environment. Anything that gets women to look after themselves so that they can be more appealing to men is a winner in my book.
Strangely when it was suggested that a male-only gym might open here in the UK, there was a massive uproar from the liberal and feminist quarter. The suggestion that a men-only club would promote misogyny (because that would be so terrible) and that men together would become secretive, I guess the idea being we would club together and disagree with the feminist agenda.
This article is about the reasons men only gyms are important to neomasculinity and how they assist men with two very important parts of this ideology; self improvement and testosterone.
You either defend free speech or you don’t. There are no buts at the mid-point of the sentence. You don’t say, “I defend free speech but” because right at that moment you are a quisling to the cause of supporting free speech. You should particularly encourage the free speech of those that disagree with you or hold alternate views.
And you should be deeply suspicious of the motives of anyone on your political, philosophic, or moral side who seeks to silence their opponents. For that is the sign that their arguments are weak, and their morality is flawed. And at that point it is your responsibility to publicly condemn them. And if you do not, if you say nothing when you know in your heart that what they are doing is wrong, then you are as damned as them.
You will be judged (or you will be ignored)
Those are pretty much the only two choices.
Being judged is uncomfortable. Snap judgments, prejudices, misinformation… all of these, combined with not enough time (how could there be) to truly know you, means that you will inevitably be misjudged, underestimated (or overestimated) and unfairly rejected.
The alternative, of course, is much safer. To be ignored.
Up to you.
There is always something wrong with a girl, no matter how beautiful. You may have to dig a little deeper, but you’ll find her thermal exhaust port with a practiced keen eye. Note that any of the above can easily apply to the hottest girl you have ever seen. That’s the beauty of the flawfinding mission: it unearths the normally overlooked blemishes scattered among a girl’s mien that her general beauty tends to obscure to men. If you socialize with a girl and gain insight into her personality, you have even more data from which to devise withering, silent judgments.
Once you have gotten reliable at noticing and promoting women’s flaws, their beauty will no longer hold such paralyzing power over you. Conditioned to emphasize a woman’s worst and attenuate her best, you will become a cad machine, irresistible to the fairer sex who will react shaken from their stupor by your dispassionate demeanor and feel the threat of your pervasive critical eye with senses aflame.
Maxim #30: Ignore a woman’s flaws at your peril. They are the key to reconfiguring your perception, and thus her attainability.
The study asked 3,583 women over 30 about their habits when it came to their mobiles.
The findings showed that 76 per cent of women look at their phone every hour and half of those cannot go 15 minutes without checking their handset.
Some 69 per cent of those polled sleep with their phones in their bedrooms, and 39 per cent look at their phones when they are the bathroom.
Among the responses to the survey were women who said that being constantly online meant they had ‘lost faith in humanity’.
Another woman said that ‘life is more robotic’ now she has to check email and social media all the time.
Despite all of the evidence to the contrary, the survey found that only 27 per cent of respondents said they were addicted to smartphones.
Asked if they would go back to a time before the Internet, a resounding 71 per cent said no.
A direct opener will signal social dominance, self confidence, and high status by its mere use. The brazen opener is itself the alpha male signaler. My suggestion when using direct openers is to be sure your body language is sufficiently alpha to be congruent with the words you are saying to the girl. Otherwise, you will quickly get blown out, because incongruence during the opener is usually the death knell for any seduction attempt.
The big advantage of indirect openers is that you can generally hit on hotter women than you can with direct openers, because the latter tends to elevate the risk of getting insta-rejected if the girl happens to dislike your look, style, walk or wiry nose hairs, all of which are traits you display before you’ve even opened your mouth. Plus, hotter girls expect to get hit on more, so indirect is better for catching them off-guard, and for settling your nerves. (This rule of thumb breaks down when you get to the 9s and 10s of womanhood, who are so intimidatingly hot to most men that they paradoxically get hit on less frequently than their looks would suggest they do.)
Spring is just around the corner, and I urge every man to consider planting a garden. First, there is the obvious food source. A garden is a frugal investment, which can provide months of crops. The quality of food will be higher than anything you can buy in a store, and it can be produced pesticide-free. Second, gardening develops an important survival skill that is fun and rewarding. Third, you are making an important step towards self sufficiency, and lastly, you stop contributing to agribusiness profits.
This is where anti-traditionalists get out their pitchforks and start screaming at me, but one of my biggest beefs with feminism is how it lies to young women about what will make them happy. A certain percentage of women are perfectly contented working in a cubicle and paying someone else to raise their children, if they choose to have them, and no one should stand in the way of their happiness, but most women are miserable under those conditions. When Forbes surveyed working mothers, fully 84% of them said being at home with their children was their dream, and of that 84%, one third said they resented their husbands for not making that possible.
Where did women get the idea that they would love their paychecks more than their children?
Kesha is asking the courts to agree that contracts with women can be voided the moment she is unhappy with the terms, with no evidence needed.
Just make an allegation of sexual misconduct, assault or rape, and boom – contract dissolved!
What business would ever enter into a contract with a woman if this were the reality? It boggles my mind that Kesha, her supporters and even her detractors do not seem to grasp that she is attempting to return women to pre-1900 conditions in which single women could not legally sign contracts, because they could not be held accountable for the costs incurred. Married women could sign contracts, of course, because their husbands would be liable. I am catching hella flak on Twitter for suggesting that women should not vote, and yet here are women suggesting that women should be ineligible to sign contracts!
I don’t think it’s a good, wonderful, laudable, happy thing that when push comes to shove, it’s men who will die, and women who will vote to send them to their deaths. I think it’s reality. It’s a reality based on the fact that men and women are not equal, and never will be.
They can’t be.
And if we are not equal, why do women get a say in how and when men die?
We may not be equal to men, but we can be fair and just. Fair and just means we don’t vote. We may lose our sons, our husbands, our fathers, our brothers, men we love, but we don’t lose our lives.
Only men do.
Only men should vote.
Linkage: 1 March 2016 #TheTriggering — No Comments
HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>