The Alt-Right is a thing. We know this because Hillary came (actually Bill came, but not inside Hillary) out of her coma to give a speech about the evils of heterosexual white men who have jobs.
Yes I know. The Alt-Right are statists. Yes they are. However since I’m not a left-wing statist I don’t have to automatically hate and attack anyone who disagrees with me about anything. The Alt-Right is grasping some of the fundamentals that I’ve been pointing at for years on Stating The Obvious. The podcast where I state the obvious.
Twelve years of Stating The Obvious in November 2016 mind you.
Anyhow, yes I’m fucking amazing. We all know that.
Here is what the Alt-Right is getting right:
- Diversity doesn’t work.
- Democracy doesn’t work.
- Circumventing natural selection doesn’t work.
- Everyone is not equal.
I have to define “work” in order for these statements to make philosophical sense. In this case by “work” I mean: Lead to the creation and maintenance of a free society in which individuals can strive to achieve their greatest potential and be independent within interdependency.
Of the Alt-Right sites I’ve been reading lately is Amerika.org. This morning I sat down to catch up on their posts and decided to do a Linkage featuring them.
I have it on my radar to to a podcast – probably more than one ’cause you know how I tangent – talking about some of the posts at Amerika.org and explaining to the anarcho-sissies why the Zero Aggression Principle does not mean white men are required to allow themselves to be exterminated. There is a great amount of confusion about that in the ancap-o-sphere as it is infiltrated by SJWs.
An infiltration you may recall which I predicted would happen.
Here it is.
Some of the most triggering (true) words you will ever be subjected to.
Now, now. Hillary quickly apologized. You know she didn’t mean it (wink, wink). Except that she obviously did. It was a classical Kinsley Gaffe. If we were allowed to report on Her Majesty’s health condition, it would be logical to point out that she choked. But that’s the insidious thing about a Kinsley Gaffe. It reveals what somebody truly thinks and believes. Hillary believes that those people do not deserve to exist in her America.
So what do you do with said basket? Mr. Logic suggests you do the same thing I would do with grass clippings or garbage. You dump the sucker out and bury the contents deep. I can’t imagine how badly a Basket of Deplorables would smell. Those who are irredeemable are better for the planet as compost. Dana Milbank is eager to push that narrative. We don’t really have to be sorry when we insult a ¡RACIST! now do we?
And all of this is far worse than just the evasion of some barmy, old Cat Lady’s political gaffe.
It is the natural progression by which we go from laughing at those we don’t like, to then degrading and demoting them to then isolating them and then disposing thereof.
When we speak of culture being upstream of politics, when we talk of prevailing Zeitgeist; this is how it works. It’s a predictable, repeatable four-step algorithm.
Donald Trump is not the end of conservatism; he is the liberation of it. Whether or not he wins, he has broken the surface tension that says conservatives cannot talk about vital issues like Nationalism and our incompatibility with Leftism. There is nothing more Rightist than that.
In my view, Donald Trump is a good candidate because he intends to win. For him winning does not mean merely attaining a position or public recognition, as it does for Leftists. He wants to make a successful project in terms of its results as a conservative would, and that requires strengthening the country and fixing its problems. In intent, at least, he will settle for nothing less, and thanks to Barack Obama’s precedent-setting abuse of executive orders with the Supreme Court’s approval, he has a legal foundation on which he can override the Left and achieve these things.
But even more, he is the standard-bearer for a new conservative mentality: we will not be bullied anymore. We will speak of the obvious and real.
We will mention the unsociable and factual, including logical facts (such as “diversity cannot work because groups have self-interest specific to themselves which clash when more than one group occupies the same space”).
We will be honest, forthright and clear.
A genius can dig more deeply into structure — the patterns of existent, not their material substrates — and in so doing undertake the mentally-demanding task of ascertaining their true nature. Here Schopenhauer agrees with Charlton on the dream-like state of genius; the person bearing genius has transcended his human state, and as a result his thinking is not constrained by self-interest.
If anything has promoted the West, it has been its abundance of genius — especially in leadership. Most of the geniuses of the West are unknown to us because their work formed the groundwork for popularizers to express to the world, and history remembers those instead. But for every great discovery, the path ahead was found by lone geniuses working independently toward understanding the root of the problem.
Currently, our society is opposed to genius, because nothing makes a crowd feel less equal than the presence of genius.
In fact, that it exists seems to refute our idea of equality entirely. At the far-right of the IQ curve, people are targets for the herd, which in its loss of confidence seeks to eliminate the symbols of its inequality.
At the forefront of this was Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD). They are a classic liberal outfit, complete with pictures of children killed by drunk drivers, and most importantly, pre-emptive guilt. Pre-emptive guilt is the power of all Leftist tropes: they are things which you cannot oppose without “looking bad” to your social group.
For example, who advocates drunk driving? None of us, because except for a few rare exceptions who are good at it because they enjoy it, it is a terrible idea. Most of us are less competent and have terrible judgment when drunk, which is why we try to avoid it.
The real problem of drunk driving is simple: people drink, and they need to get home. They go home at the end of the night, after drinking, when the “high” of the drunk has faded, and the depressant symptoms kick in, making them more likely to fall asleep and jump the center lane and plough into that bus full of orphans, which then bursts into flame.
(Insert imaginary screams of homosexual transgender minority learning disabled atheist orphans dying in agony here.)
MADD took over the political landscape by storm. Where the old guard opposed special interest groups like MADD, people were convinced to support it by the tear-jerking stories of the endless casualties of drunk driving.
No one thought to look to the cause of drunk driving, which was surmised to be moral evilness.
Soon there were many laws against drunk driving. Not surprisingly, the only party that came out ahead was government, which collects between $6,000-$10,000 per drunk driving arrest and conviction. Mostly however they catch the unwary, people who are irregular drinkers.
People that insulated from consequence see no problem with a rigged game. They all play along, they all get rewarded. Everyone gets their swag. Eventually, there isn’t any serious philosophical difference amongst the grifters. There are only power struggles over who gets their nose in the trough first and furthest. So you can’t reach a principled agreement and wind up playing chicken instead.
The coming ¡GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN! won’t even come close to the real thing. They aren’t evacuating and shutting down hundreds of ICBM silos and daring N. Korea, China and Russia to fire at will. The EBT Cards won’t shut down if the governing classes still want there to be a Kroger or Walmart that still has two standing bricks attached by mortar. The taxpayer funded security details protecting both The Donald and The Harridan will still be standing tall. Every amenity a member of congress enjoys on Capital Hill will still be functional.
The ¡GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN! will be deliberately targeted to inconvenience people these Congressmaggots do not like.
People eventually catch on. Just as fewer people are watching NFL games on account of Colon Kaepernick’s “heroic” protest, fewer people approve of government, the media, academia, et al. Basically, the believers are leaving the Cathedral. The problem is that nothing less corrupt takes its functional place.
Let us explore The Leftist Loop:
The goal of Leftism is to seize power from kings, and after that, from those who are naturally more gifted than others. To this end, it is uses passive-aggression and a begging-the-question fallacy together: assuming that everyone is equal, those who are not in favor of equality are in fact attacking equality, and must be removed, because they are the anti-peace, anti-love, and anti-good.
This is how pacifism goes from kumbaya to “kill the dissidents” in one easy step.
It happens again and again. Revolutionary France. Communist Russia. Brendan Eich. Jimmy the Greek. John Derbyshire. Anyone who speaks out against equality, or simply does not go along with the charade, is presumed to be evil and can be destroyed.
The Leftist Loop works because its essence is scapegoating. Instead of looking at the demands of reality, the loop distracts from reality by finding a symbolic reason for why everything has gone wrong. This is far, far easier than looking into the details, so it becomes popular. The herd destroys the symbol, sort of like an inverted golden calf, and then concludes it has won — until the same problem crops up yet again…. and again, and again.
Irresponsibility reached its peak in the years 2012-2015. The second Obama presidency meant that the idiots had well and truly won, because the least qualified president in American history was enthusiastically affirmed by a large group of voters who apparently did not understand or care about the damage being done by that presidency. SJWs raged across the internet, destroying lives at a whim. The EU seemed to laugh at its own citizens while sponsoring their doom.
With the death of Harambe, a powerful symbol was created: human irresponsibility resulting in the death of something rare and precious. There are not many gorillas left, and those that do exist are threatened by the encroachment of human civilization caused by our quantity-not-quality expansion to reckless levels.
On the other hand, idiotic and apathetic parents are plentiful, as are stupid children. We shot the wrong party in Cincinnati.
2016 has brought us massive pushback against the irresponsibility not so much of our leaders, but of “our” people. They keep voting morons into office, fail to notice how dire our situation has become, deny actual problems and chase symbolic ones, and engage in other behavior that Harambe would recognize as belonging to lesser monkeys and lacking the gravitas of a powerful silverback.
The pushback has rise to full power with Donald Trump not so much as a candidate, but as a symbol for the refusal to apologize, grovel, pacify and compensate. In other words, he is a rebellion against the type of thinking that led to the shooting of Harambe because of the irresponsibility of a family. Those who are responsible, this symbol says, are not responsible for the actions of the irresponsible.
. . . . .
This is part of an ongoing realization by people in the first-world, especially the competent, that most of humanity is parasitic and failure-bound. Only a few percent of any human population manage to have lives of relative sanity, and the rest are neurotic and manic monkeys, flailing around by chasing symbols and being distracted by shiny objects, unable to focus on the reality in front of them.
Going down this path of thinking leads to two realizations: first, diversity cannot ever work, because our interests are separate from those of all other groups, and therefore our interests are contradictory when placed in the same society; second, that democracy cannot work because most people are mentally lazy, and in any group, the mentally lazy will win out over the others.
. . . . .
Without democracy, leaders would have to be responsible. They would have to tell the Cincinnati zoo to ignore the cries of the irresponsible parents who allow their children to self-destruct. They would have to tell idiots that they are, in fact, idiots, and do not deserve high rank. And so on. The social nature of human politics would be upended, and replaced with a realistic one.
Peak irresponsibility shows people tiring of having to tolerate stupidity and ineptitude on a daily basis in order to uphold sacred bovines like equality and pluralism. We want results. As one saying on the internet goes, apropos of Harambe, “This is why we can’t have nice things,” referring to the tendency of idiots to show up and leave behind dead gorillas and litter as a result of their own irresponsibility.
Restorationists desire the four pillars of making civilization functional again:
1. Rule by culture. Government and police are inferior methods compared to citizens who view society as a cooperative endeavor toward a goal, according to principles held in common. These are a product of culture. To defend culture, all who are not of the ethnic group must be excluded; this is a principle called Nationalism. With nationalism, government is deprecated and day-to-day order is kept through use of shame, ostracism and exclusion to keep outsiders and saboteurs at bay.
2. Hierarchy and excellence. Society can either take its rich and powerful and assume they are good, or find those among its people who are excellent — superior in ability, leadership, intelligence and moral insight — and give them the wealth and power to use well. 99% of humanity will make these decisions wrong, and all people in groups will choose to avoid facing real issues. We need those who do the opposite to have power and wealth to ensure that it is used well, much as (in theory) we entrust nuclear weapons only to those of excellent character.
3. Positive reward systems. Again we face a primary division: we either force everyone to conform and look for anomalies to punish, or we diligently reward those who do well so that they ascend to positions of leadership. A heroic culture does some of this, but on a more practical level, so does capitalism: it rewards those who find opportunity and meet needs, as kept in check by culture and hierarchy.
4. A transcendental goal. No healthy society has merely material goals. It aims to achieve the impossible so that it can constantly improve, such as the motives of ancient societies to achieve balance, harmony, equilibrium and excellence. Religion is part of this, but not the whole. We must collaborate toward a goal again and have it be more than tangible, but eternal.
Each of these four pillars is so massively taboo in our society that mere mention of it sends the people who are vested in the system scurrying for cover.
These are the poisons that un-do our current dysfunctional order, which makes them medicine for those who wish to escape certain doom as civilization collapses, including the destruction of all they have worked for.
Why is Leftism so obsessive? Because it represents a dream: that conflict can be eliminated for the individual, meaning that they are always accepted and supported regardless of the choices they make. Morality, reality and logicality thus are ranked lower than the individual and its desires.
Leftists are responsible for the greatest violence in history, the most deaths, and the greatest number of failed states. And still, whenever some credulous neurotic like Bernie Sanders or outright criminal like Hillary Clinton shows up, throngs of people are there willing to vote for them.
While benefits are a huge part of it, that is not the whole. No: people must undertake an inner process of detachment in order to vote for what they know in their hearts will end in tragedy. Leftism is moral corruption first, and only second, a convenient flow of money from the competent to the inept and parasitic.
For example, in Europe, people voted for politicians who promptly unleashed a flood of immigration on them. In theory, this was done to provide workers who could be taxed to pay for the benefits of existing citizens. But the support for the pro-immigration side remains fanatical, even in the face of mass rapes, crime, and vandalism. Why?
The answer is that many people have staked their personal identity on Leftism because it rewards their individualism. Under Leftism, they are “good” for not being good, and safe from being criticized or ranked in a hierarchy according to their accomplishments, which range from nothing to only the self-serving, like Angela Merkel or Bill Clinton.
This is the nature of the Crowd: they fear and doubt their own worth, and so they seek to destroy all who have risen above them, so that their own activity becomes the norm and social chaos camouflages their bad deeds. They want to be free of judgment, which means that all heritage, culture, standards, values and purpose must be abolished.
The most obvious rebuttal here is that we do not have a free market system, but a system managed by many layers of regulation. Clever monkey Leftist (CLM) who wrote the article wants you to forget that and blame capitalism. Second point is that trusting any economic system to run a society is stupid; you need leadership. Leadership is demonized however by democracy, which cannot false the harsh truths necessary for leadership, so it elects actors who pass on difficult problems and let economic constraints “solve” them.
Do you want quality education? Remove all government funding for it and regulations on it. Let people hire teachers for their kids. You want quality healthcare? Remove all regulations and insurance. Let people find the care that fits their needs. You want good prisons? Actually, I have no solution here, since the real answer to prisons is to reduce all punishments to either (1) death, (2) exile or (3) restitution. That takes more sanity than our low-IQ society can manage however.
. . . . .
Are large corporations what ruined our democracy? Or was it… the Jeeeews?
History shows us that instead, it was most likely democracy itself, because democracy ruins the ability of people to think clearly:
Terrorism is in the eye of the beholder. After a mass-stabbing in a Minnesota mall, the local police chief made a statement to the effect of, “But we still don’t know if this is terrorism.”
Like a chemical reaction, the right-wing social media exploded. How would it not be terrorism? The guy screamed “Allahu Ackbar” and asked potential victims if they were Muslim. (Hint to potential victims: lie.)
At the same time, we have a typical modern conundrum: “terrorism” is an ill-defined term. What the police chief means is that it is unclear whether (a) this was a lone mental health case who went seeking for an explanation for his visions and impulses and found Allah or (b) this guy was sponsored by a known terrorist group.
To flip it around, was it terrorism when Dylan Storm Roof shot nine black people in a church after praying with them? He was not associated with any organized groups, nor sponsored, and seems to have acted on his own.
Our faux elites specialize in getting us to ask the wrong questions. The question “But is it terrorism?” (said in breathless Lawrence, KS housewife lilt) is the wrong question.
The right question is: is this diversity performing normally?
Perfectly reflects how the modern city-dweller wants to move to the country and replicate the city with its diversity and fast internet. Her other statements about cruel treatment of farm animals, lack of tofu at the grocery store and the inability to find expensive-ish cosmetics in the country only serve to paint her as an ignorant and self-satisfied urbanite. She can’t help but portray herself as more moral and educated than those who surround her.
Rural life highlights the fact that your modern urban life is a sham! It must be the countryside’s fault! Because in her mind, surely she is not at fault. Damn those pesky consequences. At least in the city all of her friends would tell her how fabulous her rubbish life is and how wonderful she is for making such “brave” decisions about her life.
These are the same dysfunction: people have a vision in their minds — defended by the process of living in cities anonymously itself, and the philosophy of humanism — that what they want should be considered right, and that no one can deny it to them.
This ignores the fact that most people are delusional most of the time, as Liz Jones’ experience shows us.
The grim fact is that we need something greater than ourselves to live for. We need nature, God and truth. Without those, we simply fall back into the void of our own projection and drama, and then what that fails, we need someone to blame, like Liz Jones, a neurotic Leftist who is quoted above.
On one hand, there is projection. People sitting in comfortable chairs — suburban housewives, basement neckbeards, and people in cubicle jobs with fifteen minutes of work to do each day — project themselves onto those who are having troubles. The root of this projection is that both parties share the same scapegoat: it is not me, it is society. I could be anything, but instead I am here, unsatisfied with my life.
The other extreme comes from those who are more successful and productive, but still see no hope. They work jobs, they take home paychecks, and then watch everything trickle out the door in taxes, endless failing and broken products, insurance payments and bundles of cash to industries protected by regulation. In order to not feel bad about this, they give up inside, and conclude that everything is bad and always was bad, so there is no point doing anything about it.
The first group are mostly liberal, and the latter group mostly conservatives. Mom weeps over dead AIDS orphans she saw on television; big brother is active in civil rights; little sister is active in feminism so she can get a good job and “be independent”; Dad comes home, curses at the television, then gets a six-pack and retreats to the garage where he can indulge in a hobby he — like at his job — no longer believes in.
. . . . .
This psychology begins in the success of societies.
When civilizations thrive, they enable those who could not otherwise thrive to reproduce; these, being less capable, naturally reproduce at greater rates (the r-strategy) and thanks to the improvements created by advanced civilization, more of those survive.
Soon the society drowns in purposeless people who want to bring others down to their level, inevitably using a series of individualistic and egalitarian philosophies.
Those who have read this blog for some time know that for every Leftist agenda like gun control, there is another problem they are trying to conceal, distract and deflect from. In this case, the problem is dysgenics and class warfare, which has resulted in legions of people too mentally incompetent to use guns:
“I carry a gun on a daily basis and I believe guns would save lives if every responsible person carried one. (The key word being “responsible” people.)”
How many responsible people do we have left in the West? For someone to be responsible, they need to have the physical wiring to anticipate the results of their actions (highish IQ) and the moral fortitude to care about those consequences, plus the incentive to do so, which does not exist under diversity, because no one can say that those who will be affected by a stray shot are necessarily “their” people.
This tells us what society must do if it is to avoid downfall: it must constantly produce more of the intelligent people, and pare down or eliminate those who are foolish, or cannot survive on their own without civilization.
This requires a society willing to be more like the Spartans, who sacrificed defective children to avoid contaminating their gene pool.
An ideal way to do this gently is hierarchy keeps power in the hands of the best, and limits the options of the worst, encouraging them to leave the civilization and try their luck elsewhere. All orders break down over time, which is why “systems” do not work; what does work is keeping quality of citizenry and thought high to discourage the lower.
Modern people — to those who have crossed the abyss of thought that separates modern people from reality — seem robotic and confused on this point. They cannot conceive of anything other than a system which makes guarantees based on universal, formalized action.
In fact, the path to health is like that of nature. No universality, because people are not equal; no formalization, because systems are easily gamed by the cynical but defective. This is the natural order to which our ancestors aspired, and if we are to reverse modernity, it is what we must target again.
Cities = social, not realistic/practical like the country or the burbs. Out there, you need to show results directly, not through a long chain of people who have been conned into buying, voting or enthusiastically applauding the appearance-based idea you sold them.
Sales is, as cons are, mostly based upon appearance. You make an image in the mark’s mind that makes him think buying this watery beer really will make him be surrounded by blonde women in bikinis, or that voting for one insane proposal or another is the “right” thing to do and will make other people like and respect him.
It is not hard to hack the human mind. Most people stumble through life getting conned on a regular basis, but then rationalize it and move on. They rarely confront the method of the con and think through how to avoid having it happen again.
In social terms, this takes the form of passive aggression. “Here is what I believe, and if you believe differently, you are attacking me.”
All of the liberal drama over being offended, triggered, etc. is designed to further this agenda. They want to style themselves as the victim and you as the aggressor, which causes their assumptions to be considered true.
In order to disguise their raw manipulation, they go seeking for cases of victimhood where they can identify with the victims, and use a presumption of guilt on the part of their targets — after all, they are not victims, so they must be victimizers — to bully the targets into accepting their nonsense.
The only known defense against this kind of attack is to have a strong social values system that excludes guilt and focuses instead on real solutions, which ends the victimhood presumption and dismantles the Leftist attack.
And this is not just something that happens out in Indian Country. The Buccaneers don’t just play football in Tampa. They also rob and cut-up over at Walmart. And all of this impacts others who go nowhere near a Walmart. The costs of the Walmart crime negative externality manifest themselves in several manners.
9-1-1 is a joke. An officer taking 2.5 hours to arrest a petty shoplifter at Wallymart is not available to assist if your daughter is getting butt-raped by a pack of human jackals.
You will pay taxes for police overtime and additional officers. Cleaning up the lifestyle cesspool at your local Walmart costs money. It costs the public money in Walmart won’t pay to do so themselves.
Property Values decline in the vicinity. Real estate markets adjust rapidly when a neighborhood goes into the toilet. Tax collections go down. Less desirable tenants occupy the surrounding area. More desirable tenants and people avoid the Walmart. Social and financial capital flees the Walmart.
Walmart has hacked the system of our declining Amerikan empire. It is the Alpha scavanger.
It will make a killing off of the societal carrion. It is how the powerful use the weak. It is how the manipulative game the system. It is how our national decline is the Era of The Munchkin. It is how things are after the goldrush.
The only sensible answer is that by making conditions safe, good and orderly, we enact the greatest removal of Darwinian evolutionary pressures on the population.
This results in a proliferation of people with crazy ideas, and a society which is adamant in its defense of individual liberty at the same time.
Civilizations that collapse tend to be the most promising ones. The intelligent, valiant and mentally organized produce conditions under which their citizens thrive but then, thanks to the weakness of the human heart, those citizens find themselves taking civilization for granted. They then side with those who are born purposeless.
In nature, predation and starvation filter out those who cannot be realistic enough to adapt to their environment. In primitive human civilization, the same happens. Only in advanced civilizations, where each person is presumed to be intelligent and therefore worth defending, does humanity unmake its greatest accomplishments.
In addition, government has its own agenda, since it is a separate party from the organic nation comprised of citizens, culture, values, religion and heritage. Its first goal is to remain in power, and this goal dominates all others.
For this reason, government has incentive to always expand its reach, which inevitably occurs by promising things that people are afraid to vote against: aid to the poor, welfare, diversity, gender equality.
One way to do so is to hijack the social war machine of the left and turn it on them. Shouting “racist” is a means of chastising healthy in-group preference and anything that gets within a hundred miles of that. This attack works because it equivocates white self-interest with an interest in harming non-whites, and as an extension of this, also equivocates recognition of racial differences with genocidal intent.
The simple fact is that those who use the word “racist,” whites and non-whites alike, hate white people and want them gone.
. . . . .
There are a few things that can happen when the word “racist” is used. On an individual level, it causes the targeted white person severe psychological stress as they subconsciously imagine themselves cast out from the warmth and protection of the herd. Nothing good comes from this, and it’s easy to see this for the cruel bullying that it is.
Another thing that can happen is the murder and rape of large numbers of whites. South Africans were badgered endlessly with the word until they finally relented, and allowed power to pass to those who hated them, with the predictable result that thousands of white farmers were murdered. For the police officers of Rotherham, the mere thought of the word was enough to strike them impotent and watch in cowardice as thousands of children were raped by Pakistanis who considered them livestock.
Every single day, whites around the world bow their heads and take hatred quietly and let themselves, their friends, and their relatives get robbed, raped, and murdered because they don’t want to do a single thing that could possibly lead to them being called “racist.”
. . . . .
Demographic patterns are not secret knowledge. Leftist aims can no longer be denied when there are SJWs in every organization screeching about “fucking white males” who have too much privilege. The simple fact is that those who use the word “racist,” whites and non-whites alike, hate white people and want them gone. With no evidence of life anywhere else in universe, to desire the obliteration of something as rare and with as much potential as Western Europeans is cruelty on a cosmic scale.
All of this, based on a lie—that being unashamed of being white is evil. The truth that must substitute this lie is that those who use the word “racist” are hateful and evil. In order to do so, my suggestion is to call them “leukomisiacs” because they are people who adhere to “leukomisia,” or the hatred of whites. Whenever someone shouts “racist,” we expose them as a leukomisiac.
Responsibility will be the death of us — or rather, the second type of responsibility will. The original type is responsibility for one’s actions, which means that the person is obligated to use self-discipline to make sure their actions will have the desired results in reality, and then is estimated based on the success or failure of an action and all actions by that person before it. We call that reputation and it is highly important.
The second type of responsibility involves a proto-subsidy for those who are not thriving.
In this responsibility, the weak eat the strong, because the strong are compelled to take care of the weak.
This is the fundamental security hole in society itself: anyone who chooses to become parasitic can simply not succeed, and then all the “good, decent and prosperous” people will try to help them, which enables those who are not actually failing use society as a host for their own sustenance and progeny.
Back when humanity was small, parasitic people could be denied property within the boundaries of the town or city, and had to go live in the wilderness. Now that the wilderness is the minority, this cannot be done, and they would have to be formally exiled to the many third-world nations whose population dwarfs that of the first world. Instead, the productive people fear being seen as threatening by others, and include the parasites in society by giving them unnecessary jobs, subsidies/welfare and political voice.
Every successful civilization to date has destroyed itself with some variant of this method. They cannot summon the will to replace natural selection and the hierarchy of the wolf-pack with a social equivalent, and so those who could not survive without civilization increase, while those who could survive under any circumstance are destroyed by the miserable life that is created: constant obligation to work to support the parasites, incessant ineptitude and delaying tactics by the non-thriving, and waiting around while the simpler bungle their way through non-complex transactions — and then have their lives complicated and slowed down by the bureaucracy that springs up to address the bungling.
What humanity instead needs is a mandate for leisure: people need more hours a day not working at jobs, sleeping or doing the other work-like tasks of survival than they spend on those pursuits. Leisure does more than give us rest; it allows our thoughts to wander, so that we have more options in our mind than the robotic ten or so responses that are called for by jobs, bureaucracy and socializing. We need to discover ourselves. Leisure — loafing, wandering, woolgathering, daydreaming — this is the core of the human soul.
So, regardless of the outcome of the Presidential Election, Donald Trump has done our great nation a vital favor. By demonstrating that the logical, intellectual end point of the Bush Family ideology was a futile dead-end terminating in national suicide, he tore down The Cuck Dynasty. It is our job as the Reactionary Vanguard to insure this malignancy never raises its ugly head again. Compassionate Conservatism is by definition neither. The New World Order is by necessity a vacuum attached to your wallet and a revolver pointed at your temple.
Everything the Bushes pushed for was stamped pre-approved by the Cathedral.
It was deemed polite, acceptable dissent. That made it no real dissent at all. That made the Bushes a vile Cuck Dynasty.
Every now and then you encounter a real person. They generally have a furtive look, as if they were foreign agents in a hostile land, which they are. Nothing they care about will be understood by the masses. Nothing they see can be shared. Nothing they know is true will be perceived as anything but irrelevant or worse, a self-serving lie.
The real people have been holding on to the idea of civilization for the past four thousand years as lies have piled on lies. The first idea was that there were no people who were better than others; this meant that those who told lies were seen as being as good as those who were truthful. This meant that everyone was safe from judgment, or in other words, safe from reality.
Since then society has been ruled by a series of proxies. Since we cannot choose the best to lead us, we set up some hoops for them to jump through, and reverse logic to conclude that those who jump through the hoops are the best. Real logic: find our best people. Fake logic: the people who do best at this trivial task are our best. The part stands for the whole, the moment supplants the lifespan.
. . . . .
And now, thirty years later, we watch the clock tick down in the West. The obviously corrupt, criminal and incompetent candidate Hillary Clinton may or may not have Parkinson’s; that’s a proxy for what we want to talk about, which is that she is vile and possibly evil and in any case, inept and soulless.
No one in public office or a public-facing role in business is competent. They are also all not-good. They follow the trends like the rest, hoping to cash in on the latest mass mania that has obsessed the Crowd because they need it to distract themselves from the yawning abyss, and with their dollars grasped in grubby hands, they control society.
We know — and we have known — that no society can exist by mass rule. Most people, including most with college degrees who think they are super-geniuses, have no ability to make those decisions.
But our pretense of being nice guys so our neighbors will buy our stuff demands that we pretend that all of these idiots are Kings and geniuses.
Very few people are focused on the real task: reversing the decline of our civilization.
Civilizations are living things. They are not abstractions. They are composed of people who share an ideal. Together, they take different roles — not equal ones — and put their effort toward maintaining a state of life. This gives people comfort and safety, but more importantly, pride. They are part of something they can believe in.
This is the most important aspect of life: pride. It has two parts. We must believe in what we are doing, and be driven to make it go further and be better than ever before. This is what keeps people going, when food is low and sleep is nonexistent. It is what nurtures life, even more than food, sleep, water and sex.
The West suffers from a lack of pride, except in the transient, because it has a lack of purpose. Our goal has become — well, nothing — and so we have made ourselves into servants of others, forgetting our own potential and the greatness that can come of it.
There remains no task except to restore this. It does not come to us through a single point of focus — race, religion, culture, values, God — but through a desire to have those things, and a will to use each one to balance the other.
Looking back on this time, historians will see Brexit and the rise of Donald Trump as parallel movements. As if an answer to Fukuyama’s “end of history,” these show the highwater point of liberal democracy.
Liberal democracy, or the system of democracy plus civil rights including diversity, reached dominance with the defeat of the axis powers in WWII, and after the fall of the Soviet Union, absorbed the aspects of socialist theory that had previously been considered untenable because of their similarity to Soviet policies.
However, liberal democracy is a “system,” or a set of rules designed to guide interchangeable people toward the right results by algorithm. In this case, we measure governance by popularity. Like all other systems, liberal democracy has proven to be unable to restrain its repetitive use of past successful techniques, which is an inversion of thought. When you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail; increasing equality is our hammer.
. . . . .
This is a revolution against globalization, which is the ultimate end of liberal democracy, because as an ideology it cannot tolerate competition and therefore must rule the world.
If an ideology asserts that something is true, and a contrary example exists, the ideology appears debunked, which is why Leftists worldwide are engaged in fanatical campaigns to smash, censor, disenfranchise, disemploy, ostracize, impoverish and imprison those who are not consciously ideological adversaries, but are certainly ideological non-conformists.
Social media is dying. The primary reason is not because of its censorship, but because of what its censorship portends: it has given up on getting the cutting-edge audience, and wants instead to go out like MySpace, catering to the least competent users for as long as possible, then collapsing.
As an internet service, one has a choice. The service can be designed for the power users, and the rest will tag along as best they can, or when the power users leave, it can be designed for the lowest common denominator. The latter gets a larger audience, over the short term, but the former produces growth.
This creates the “MySpace cycle”: a new hip community grows from an elite of power users and early adopters, then becomes accessible to all, at which point the modern pattern occurs and the masses alter the character of the service by doing the same stupid stuff they do everywhere else. Quality declines.
With the fall of quality, the early adopters and power users flee for greener pastures. The company providing the service has grown and added dependents — more employees, lawyers, stockholders, and advisors — and is reminded by them of its need to kick up the profits. And so, in a classic MBA move, the service slashes costs and makes itself friendlier to the broadest section of its potential audience.
. . . . .
The use of bans and censorship shows that the service is no longer interested in being a community. In a community, people exchange conversation, and with it, points of view. They are able to handle having different points of view, including controversial ones, because there is an active dialogue and difference is respected because the issues are interesting.
A service run only for profit however has no interest in community. It is there to provide an illusion as a product, and the people who consume this product — like television watchers in a former generation — want only a reflection of themselves and their thoughts, mainly because people are solipsistic and the less intelligent ones even more so.
Twitter (for example) knows it is going to die, because MySpace died and Digg died. All social media dies when it becomes popular with the idiots and then the power users leave as a result. Twitter is just trying to squeeze as much from the lemon as it can before the end, which requires pandering to total idiots like SJWs — otherwise unemployables — and if it loses some smart people, oh well. Its new audience will not care or want them.
The Left appeals to monkey dynamics. Leftists ideas are more socially correct than Rightist ideas, because the ideal of the Left is equality and the Right favors hierarchy, and social situations value only universal inclusion so that the members of that social group can feel stable because there is no tension, competition or conflict. This is an illusion but one that humans can no more resist than magpies can turn away from shiny objects.
The idea of everyone being included and having a share makes humans have warm happy feelings inside — this is actually their brains turning off and their bodies preparing for animal death, as if recognizing the triumph of a predator — and so they will choose it every time.
This is why any social group which is not policed by a hierarchy will drift Leftward.
The mainstream right directs its energy toward preserving what is left of the status quo; the alternative right recognizes that our society is not only a sinking ship, but is built on false assumptions starting with the delusion idea that equality can replace hierarchy.
No right wing movement has succeeded in resisting this decay in part because it cannot be resisted; Western civilization needs someone to pound the RESET button and start over. Everything we think we know is tainted with assumptions brought in from the ideas and people infected with the delusion of equality.
While the new right seeks to rebuild from within a liberal framework of the welfare state, and neoreaction seeks exit by small groups who will then be inevitably re-absorbed, the alternative right — an out-of-focus coalition of those united more by a feeling of dread and distrust of all Leftist ideas — recognizes that not only is the ship sinking, but that it must be destroyed before it can be rebuilt.
This may seem extreme. After all, if Western societies just aborted any changes made after 1945, things would return to stability. But this is where the alternative right rises above the rest: it recognizes that just going back is not enough. We must renew, because even back then the seeds were sown, and the path will not change on instant replay.
. . . . .
Nothing about our time is good except our material prosperity. Everyday life is meaningless and filled with ugliness, tedium and a constant struggle for power as the lower try to keep the naturally more gifted from rising to their natural place. Our cities are war zones where we struggle for enough money to buy our way into the areas that are not blighted.
If one accepts this as normal, it is possible to find similar bargains — better values for the money — in housing, medicine, entertainment and career. However the fundamental problem remains: our time and energy are wasted, while nothing we do can have any significance, all the while the rot gets stronger around us. This society is terminal.
. . . . .
The only sensible response is fanaticism. Support nothing that is Leftist; stop linking to Wikipedia, reading Leftist news, or earning or buying anything you do not need, as the taxes support the beast. Barter among friends as much as possible, work for cash whenever possible, and every day get out there and raise a hue and cry about how this society is dying and must be restarted, because that is the ultimate taboo.
Most importantly, we need to work toward power. If 2% of Western citizens find themselves agreeing on civilization restart, a critical mass will be reached, and we will pass the threshold of no return.
Never accede to the argument that we can fix the leaky ship; always insist on its replacement.
Ignore the zombies and focus on reaching that 2%.
Western civilization suffers from two problems: First, it is infested with Leftism; second, it lost its ability to think inside-to-out. The two are related, as both are symptoms of increasing individualism/hubris brought on by social success.
The only solution to Leftism is recognizing what it is (egotistic individualism expressed collectively through egalitarianism) and then facing the ugly fact that conservatives, or indeed anyone who is not Leftist, cannot coexist with Leftists.
We do not have to kill them, but they must go elsewhere.
They use other groups like ethnic minorities, gays, transgenders and women as a weapon against people who want sane and realistic lives and believe in civilization. The solution is thus not to attack those groups like moronic neo-Nazis, but to go to the source, and attack Leftism.
As part of this, it is essential to raise the cost of being a Leftist. Since democracy always shifts Leftward, for the past two centuries Leftists have faced no real risk, since government supports them when they agitate, riot and subvert. But if there were actually some danger and penalty for being Leftist, many would abandon the movement.
What torments African-Americans is this: they cannot have pride in their society. This occurs for two reasons: history and diversity.
No matter how much America and Europe change into multi-ethnic societies, Africans in these nations will be aware of history, which is that they were brought here as slaves or post-colonial subjects. This society was not designed for them, or by them; no matter how much they advance, in it they are a conquered people.
Diversity provides the other half of the denial of pride. When a society is diverse, behavior becomes an unknown and trust evaporates. In a society of people of the same heritage, everyone has roughly the same goals, inclinations and capabilities. In a diverse society, no standard like that exists, so each person is an unknown, working for personal goal.
This denies the ability to have society-wide standards and identity. These are necessary for pride: a belief that the society one is in has been created for people like oneself, and that it has cultural and moral standards which benefit people of that type. Instead, people are merely occupants, hanging out for the money and political stability.