Happy Tuesday friends and enemies. Today’s edition of Linkage is brought to you by the letter A. That’s A for ass. My ass that you can kiss. Linkage is also brought to you by a bottle of Glenfiddich Single Malt Scotch Whisky aged 12 years.
As I gaze about the world around me with my newly lasered eyeballs I see . . . the collapse of Western Civilization, parasites, a lovely sunset, a girl in yoga pants, and the unnatural (perhaps even unholy) circumvention of natural selection.
Speaking of natural selection, let’s kick this off with some good news.
When I first heard the news that everyone’s favorite Youtube personality Emily Hart had died in a tragic e-scooter accident I obviously felt some degree of regret for her and her family and loved ones. No matter how deluded she had been in life and no matter how poor her personal choices, she had a right to live and exist just as much as anyone else does.
Natural Selection! Yay!
Emily Hart was old, ugly, obnoxious, splattered upon the wall, and one of the reasons Western Civilization is dying. Thankfully she died before successfully thawing out those frozen eggs and cursing the world with her parasitic spawn.
Her death was not tragic. Her death is wonderful. Her death is a celebration of progress and evolution. Unlike Adam I have zero regret or sympathy or any other such emotion for her family. Her parents failed to raise her to be a proper woman and citizen of Western Civilization. Had her parents cared about her maybe they’d have put a bit more effort into it.
You wanna see tragic? Click here for actual tragedy.
Since we’re visiting Mr. Piggotts website let us hit upon some hawt chicks – I mean let us hit upon some other topics on which he has opined as of late. I hit upon a 9.5 in the grocery store the other day. You’ll hear that story tomorrow.
Speaking of chycks you know by now there are places women should and should not be. One of the many places they should not be is the workplace.
Over the years I have had many workplace related conversations where colleagues would voice complaints about someone else in the workplace. Perhaps they rub them slightly the wrong way, but whatever the reason the motivation is the same – they don’t particularly like a certain colleague as an individual. The complaint has nothing to do with the skills or ability level of the other person, it is simply a personality clash.
My response is usually a variation of the following theme: you don’t go to work to make friends. If you do manage to make friends then that is what is known as a bonus play. But the reason you are at work is primarily because of an exchange. You provide your skills, expertise, and time while your employer pays you money. Anything that gets in the way of that exchange is unacceptable. You would find it unacceptable if your employer didn’t pay you the agreed amount at the agreed time. Consider then the reverse of the situation.
Related to this is the equally pertinent and annoying habit of people who delight in bringing their personal problems and issues to the workplace. Everyone has these issues, it is a part of life. But if we all brought them to the workplace then the entire edifice would fall apart. Thus those who do are engaged in an unfair imposition on everyone else.
Certainly men are guilty of everything Adam points to in this passage. But there are also a small (too small (that’s what she said)) number of men who keep their personal life away from work, keep their problems away from work, keep their trauma and drama away from work, and simply do their bloody jobs. There are virtually no women capable of doing this.
Can you imagine for one moment . . . stop and do this . . . close your eyes and image going to work 40 hours a week with . . . Emily Hart.
Women can not stop talking about themselves. Even at work what do women talk about most of the time? Themselves. I work with women currently. I have worked with women in the past. They talk about themselves, and their problems, and their trauma, and their drama, all fucking day.
Okay. I’m exaggerating. Women can stop talking about themselves for short periods of time. The short periods of time in which they are talking about other women for the express purpose of stabbing said other women in the back. Because that’s how women get ahead in the workplace. Stabbing each other in the back and laying on their back.
Yes. I know. You know this one woman who got a promotion at work because she earned and deserved it. You also know ninety-nine women who swim through the workplace doing the backstroke.
I know two women who are quite good at their jobs and whom I enjoy working with. This doesn’t mean all women should have jobs.
I drank a cup of coffee that was good (because it was made by Adam Piggott) but that don’t mean all cups of coffee are good.
Women lack everything needed to get paid money in exchange for creating value for other people. They can’t show up on time. They can’t work more than four hours without stuffing food in their faces. They can’t wear sensible shoes. They can’t get rained on. They can’t drive. They can’t math. They can’t logic. They can’t focus. They can’t problem solve. I mean fuck. When you’ve gone your entire life with your daddy and brothers and boyfriends and orbitals solving every problem you encounter in life from paying your way through college to paying off your credit card debt to paying for your abortions how in the fuck are you going to build up any sort of problem solving skills?
You’re not. Shut the fuck up.
The idea that these fucking women who are so god-fucking-damned helpless that they need all woman clubs to ride bikes, write code or drink beer because they can’t do any of those things if men are in the room are suddenly going to become critical thinking problem solving roundhouse kicking mustang saviour level solution implementers in the workplace is stupid as fuck and an idea that can only be held by a fucking economic retard or someone who has never actually worked with women.
And fucking Jesus fucking Christ on a fucking stick I do not want to hear any of your TOWS (This One Woman Shit).
There are three sorts of people who think women should have jobs.
1. Femistatists. Both male and female and trannie and confused.
2. Cucks. Cucks gotta cuck ‘cause they love some egalitarianism.
3. People who don’t actually have jobs. They might be independently wealthy, or work from home running their own business, or they might even be poor and on welfare. For whatever reason they don’t go to a workplace and have to work with ,or Gods help them for, women.
Much as people who have never served in the military should shut up about the military, and especially women in the military – so too should those of you without jobs stifle yourself when it comes to your uninformed opinions of women in other people’s workplace working with other people.
How about you go get a job working with and working for women and you do that job for a few years then you get back to me.
You fucktards who don’t have real jobs working with actual women have this failed logic that goes like this: “I know one woman who is good at her job therefore women should be allowed to have jobs.”
By the way, how do you know she’s good at her job? Does she work for you? Do you work with her? Or did she tell you she’s good at her job?
How about we apply that same logic to . . . Jews.
“I know this one Jew who makes women suck his dick to get rolls in his movies therefore all Jews should make women suck their dick to get jobs.” Suddenly your “I know this one . . .” excuse for logic falls apart don’t it.
Although… Making women suck dicks for jobs doesn’t sound like such a bad idea. I mean what with that massively high IQ Jews have . . . maybe the obviously fictitious Jew in my example has the right idea. No Jew would ever actually do such a thing. Jews are soooooooooo high IQ and smart and hard working. They are Gods chosen people.
“Dr. J (you kids don’t even know who I’m talking about) is really good at basketball. All black men should play basketball.” Just like that your logic is exposed as racist.
By the way kids, Dr. J was the fucking bomb. One handed dunks. Fly like a mother fucking eagle.
Speaking of people (I use the term “people” loosely) who should be gassed, how about journalists?
Foster would have been within his rights to make such an announcement 50 years ago, but in today’s #MeToo environment it is a total no-brainer. One of the reasons that the female writers quoted in the article are so upset is because Foster’s move is the workplace version of MGTOW. However, unlike private MGTOW which I consider to be a cop-out and self defeating, workplace MGTOW is an absolute necessity for the modern man. The women are so angry because their only recourse against workplace MGTOW is shame and ridicule. But if the man involved simply does not care what these women think of him then they are effectively powerless.
That’s a place where you want to be.
Another reason that Foster is so smart here is the modern reality that in many cases women are literally overgrown children. Not only can you not reason with them but their behavior includes childlike revenge patterns with no awareness or care of the potential consequences.
Take the following Twitter feed report of a young woman in the workplace who had an article corrected by her editor and her subsequent meltdown. (Note – she’s a young female writer so she is exactly the type of individual that Robert Foster is not prepared to be left alone in a room with.)
Workplace MGTOW wouldn’t be necessary is women didn’t have jobs.
Once again we see what The Great One has told you over and over and over based on his actual experience working at jobs with women – not reading things on the internet or taking feminist classes at college.
When women enter the workplace the men in the workplace have to change what they are doing to accommodate the women. Women can not change to accommodate the men or the workplace as it stands because women are children and women are objects. Women are not agents. This is why the self-help industry focuses on women. Women will be customers for life because no matter how many self-help books women read they can’t change themselves. They are objects and children. Not agents. They have no fucking agency (he pointless screamed into the canyon yet again).
Once upon a time in a galaxy far far away men went to work and worked. They did the actual job they were paid to do. They were going their own fucking way. They went their own fucking way right to work where they did their jobs and got paid to do their fucking jobs which they fucking did in exchange for money. Going their own fucking way the whole fucking time.
Then women entered the workplace and these men who were going their own way to work and doing their jobs for money now had to go their own way yet again. To escape the women. The women who once in the workplace continued to do what women do.
Gossip. Back-stab. Lie. Manipulate. Cry. Blame. Have emotional breakdowns. Attention-whore.
Workplace MGTOW is only an “absolute necessity” because cucks have allowed women into the workplace. Once again the idea of solving the problem at its root and origin is simply not up for discussion. We all have to dance around the fat woman in the room because should any man with a job hurt the feelings of the fat women in the room he will get fired.
And thanks to cucks women such as the one in the story below are entering the workplace.
The obvious solution? Women should major in STEM. Just image this woman breaking down over a disagreement about the melting point of iron, the direction water flows, or the answer to 1254 divided by 7.5. Yes. Let’s get more women into STEM. Let’s make civil engineering the equivalent of the HR department.
What could go wrong? Other than the decline (which you should be enjoying) of Western Civilization.
Yet again (yet again) let me repeat what I have been saying for years.
Men go to work to make money so they can leave work and do things they enjoy doing with their friends.
Women go to work to do things they enjoy with their friends.
For men work is a necessary evil. For women work is an extension of their social life and their boyfriend. And like everything else in their life they manage to fuck it up because they go to work each day and commence with the gossip, back-stabbing, trauma and drama. The personal lives of most women are disasters and they see the job as an extension of their personal life.
Would you like to have Emily Hart as your boss?
Men want motion. Women want security. There is no security in progress. Women almost never contribute to progress. It’s against their nature, their genetics, and their aptitude. It’s why women shouldn’t be allowed in science. It’s why women have destroyed science.
Women want security. They divorce rape men for money.
Men want motion. We engage in day game and approach girls.
Speaking of approaching, the Trumpenfuhrer has approached the truth. You know, the truth I’ve been telling you for years now.
The truth that shithole countries are shithole countries because of the people who live there. Not because of white men.
Countries with 60% or more populations of white people of European descent have flush toilets, indoor plumbing, roads, electricity, internet, blonde chycks, women’s volleyball and democracy.
Democracy… Yea, you can’t win ‘em all.
Countries with 60% or more black people don’t have those things. Fucking Jesus fucking Christ still nailed to the fucking stick, they aren’t called mud people because of the colour of their fucking skin you ignorant fucktarded cuck desperate to virtue signal how not-racist you are. They are called mud people because they live in the fucking mud.
And bringing the mud people to the United States isn’t going to change them. They will simply come here and make mud from your precious magic dirt.
Frustrated at every turn by obstruction from Democrats and some Republicans, Donald Trump decided to open the Overton Window a bit further. First, when frustrated by the courts over an immigration-counting census, he simply worked around them, denying them the protracted battle they desired.
Then, he stirred up his favorite “fireside chat” device, Twitter, with a series of bombastic statements about American national identity:
Trump makes a simple point: we built this by not doing what the rest of you were doing, and it became great, so the last thing we need is people coming here and telling us that their ways are better than ours.
. . . . .
He sends a wakeup call to all Americans (and Europeans) to get over our guilt and start being proud of what we have done, and to reject any who are not of our heritage who are criticizing us. They are not here to “educate” us or show us an “enlightened” way. They are here to conquer, through guilt.
It’s time to give up the hold guilt has on you.
Women in the workplace? Guilt.
The Great Replacement? Guilt.
My old enemy utilitarianism? Guilt. And low intelligence.
Speaking of people who should be gassed, untilitarians.
This birthed The Enlightenment, or the birth of individualism. Where previous thinking had emphasized external order — social, natural, caste, divine — the new way of thinking suggested that society existed as a support for the individual to chase what he decided was important.
Individualism translated into egalitarianism when applied to society because when addressing individuals, one must affirm individualism for each of them, which can only be applied by removing social rules and restraints equally so that each may achieve maximum lack of oversight.
Within politics, individualism immediately branched into two forms:
Leftism. This theory espouses the idea that society must guarantee political, social, sexual, genetic, and even economic equality.
Classical liberalism. A variant of Leftism, this holds that society must refrain from restraining the individual based on too many social ideals and cultural norms.
We know classical liberals because they tend to endorse the free market. Instead of society enforcing realistic principles, they argue, we allow the markets to do so, because they are realistic and will reward the good and punish the bad.
Unfortunately, this quickly becomes overwhelmed when people form Crowds, and those crowds reward others who think the same things, and then they support each other and form a little gang within a society, attempting to control it.
In this way, classical liberalism always leads to Leftism, which is its parent. Both assume that people are equally capable of choice, and that these choices form a society, instead of the obvious which is that these choices divide society into many competing interests.
Unity works; disunity does not.
Individualism posits disunity as a virtue. For unity to exist, there must be some social, natural, or divine order which guides individuals to act as is necessary for civilization; with disunity, civilization acts like a business which facilitates the desires of individuals.
In turn, individuals give civilization their money through taxes, and that and voting comprise the sum total of their efforts to preserve and advance civilization. Not surprisingly, civilizations of this nature turn crass, flighty, and libertine.
These philosophies arise from utilitarianism, or the idea that whatever most people say they think will make them happy is the best option. Utilitarianism rejects hard answers and social order, and replaces it with the ever-changing whims of the populace.
Society transitioned from an order in which individuals fit, to an order which expands to fit all individuals, regardless of quality. This settles on a lowest common denominator consensus, and always expands to be more permissive, less orderly, and more base.
At the root of this was the desire of lower echelon people to believe that they could be higher echelon, which required them to discard the standards of excellence and organic proof of ability which selected the higher echelon.
. . . . .
That in turn gives rise to the idea of linear history, or the notion that society has reached an ultimate state of evolution and will stay in this condition regardless of our actions.
. . . . .
Over time, this process accelerates, to the point where now you can be either a socialist or a libertarian, but not someone who wants social order based on standards and goals like excellence toward which we all aim. Unity is taboo.
If you wonder why modern society opposes nationalism, monarchism, IQ, and other forms of hierarchy so strongly, you can find the answers in the utilitarianism which supports our individualism and hence egalitarianism. We have rejected unity and standards as a model.
Since we are currently two and a half centuries into the final stage of this model, where democracy breaks down all order and gives way to a more authoritarian system, the roots of change are already flourishing. Our job is to push them to extremes as quickly as possible.
Once again I may come face to face with the stupid or ignorant folks who think that anarcho-capitalism means a lack of hierarchy. You’re the same dumb fucks/cucks who think anarcho-capitalism means a lack of boarders. Hierarchy and boarders occur naturally in tribes of people. Despite what the National Socialists think hierarchy and boarders aren’t maintained by government nearly as much as they are destroyed by government. We (the Royal We) have government right now. We also have the Great Replacement and we have women in the workplace Pound Me Tooing men who don’t cater to their every wish and desire.
And speaking of the desires of strong independent fish-bicycle women who don’t need no man and are in fact equal to men and are in fact better than men and obviously should have jobs because reasons (and guilt) and equality . . .
What happens when women enter the workplace?
Those of you who don’t have jobs wouldn’t know – yet you have such strong opinions about women in the workplace . . .
OVID, N.Y. — A school resource officer in Seneca County had a romantic relationship with one of the students she was hired to protect, deputies said.
Elisia M. Panipinto, 20, of West Covert Road, Interlaken, was arrested Thursday night by the Seneca County Sheriff’s Office and charged with official misconduct, police announced Friday in a news release.
She is accused of using her position as an Interlaken police officer to have an inappropriate relationship with an eighth grader, deputies said.
Eighth graders are typically 13 or 14 years old.
Panipinto, then an officer with the Interlaken Police Department, was assigned to serve as as a school resource officer in the South Seneca Central School District at the time of the incident, deputies said. She used her authority as a police officer to have time with the child in the school and develop a “physical, romantic relationship,” deputies said.
. . . . .
Correct me if I am wrong, but the job of a high school resource officer is to develop comprehensive safety plans for schools, work with school administrators, security and staff in providing a safe learning environment. Maybe the policies have changed over the years with the feminist agenda, but last time I checked…to serve and protect doesn’t mean you get to role play with your horny, bad-boy teen (who needs super-vision due to his renegade tenancies) and let him, perhaps…cuff and stuff you while you’re 10-8 (on duty).
I just hope that this is the third or fourth trip through eighth grade for the victim…otherwise…this is one call to hornyville that Elisia shouldn’t have taken over the radio.
Fairly attractive female officer, who can barely lift an iphone=bad idea.
Fairly attractive female officer in a school, providing ‘guidance’ to a hormonal teen boy (troubled teen/badboy)= a terrible idea.
The Report Card
Methodology: I will say this again: One of the main reasons why women, generally, like to get into law enforcement, corrections or anywhere near these institutions is so that they can be closer, be nearer to the bad-boys; where they can get the tingles.
Elisa, if this is all true, will just be another statistic; another brick in the wall.
TGO would bang.
Women go to work to do things they enjoy with their friends and find alpha men to fuck them.
Finally, speaking of things I would bang let’s speak of things I would not bang.
I’ve been going on and on and on about all the screen shots I have from OK Cupid of the wrecked lives and failures who are casting about for someone more broken than them.
I present for your entertainment and education the Train Wreck Of The Week . . .
One thing you will notice on OK Cupid (should you decide to waste precious moments of your life instead of letting me waste my life to entertain you (you’re welcome)) is that the more broken people (I hesitate to call them women and insult actual women – which is odd considering I spent most of this episode of Linkage insulting women) are the more demanding they are. Given hesheit’s devotion to tolerance, diversity and intersectionality hesheit starts off with a list of all the ways you can be different than her which she is not willing to tolerate.
Then you are presented with a list of all the ways in which hesheit is broken and insecure.
The subtle threat about killing you and burning your body if you are a “fucking dick” by which I think she means “straight” is telling. Once again this is how leftists solve problems. Theft and murder. They don’t have the ability to participate in capitalism and the create of value for other humans. That’s why they hate capitalism so much.
Fuck. Do I even have to comment on this?
Too many corporations at pride. So funny on so many levels.
I can’t figure out why hesheit is trolling for sex/love/friends on the internet. Certainly there must be hundreds of people throwing themselves at hesheit day after day in a desperate attempt to be friends and lovers.
Boys, time to up your day game just in case you ever see this beauty walking the street in Austin. You should boldly walk on up to her and declare while looking her dead in the eyes that she is “devastatingly adorable” just like I did in a story you’ll hear on tomorrows podcast. Not that I’m bragging about approaching a 9.5. I would never do that.
Gosh, if only I could be man enough for her . . . him . . . it . . . them?
And every cuck out there thinks this thing should have a job.