Controlled observations of human behaviour support what I’ve been saying for years.
Women hate other women.
The reason why these women fetishize these young high school kids is because they’re children themselves, not physically, but in their own mind and psychology. They say women mature faster than boys, but they never say when they cap out. Yes, girls do mature faster than boys; that is why girls do much better than boys all throughout grade and high-school. However, boys keep maturing well past high-school and do far better than women in the long run (Evidence: Everything you see around you). If men didn’t, we wouldn’t have bridges; market systems, inventions, economics, Bitcoin, block-chain, Apple, Microsoft, Oil pumped, quantum computing, modern medicine, greater society. So what is my point?
My point is, most women don’t mature (intellectually) past high-school.
. . . . .
A woman will usually identify closer to a teenager, or child, than with a man.
That is why a lot of women go into these soft fields; daycare, early childhood education, teaching, motherhood. It’s because their mind-set is on that level.
Men are responsible for everything around you. Because men mature and don’t devote their lives to fucking over other men you are younger, thinner and better looking.
Two, men fight for dominant status, women are eliminationist. As I alluded to in a previous post about credentialism being inherently feminine and hierarchy inherently masculine, research shows men follow a “compete then cooperate” model and women follow a “compete and cast out” model. The two strategies exist because men and women have differing reproductive goals and sex roles. Men must gain status and then use that status to acquire fertile women and resources and to protect those resources from rape and pillage by competing tribes (which requires intratribal cooperation with other men).
Women don’t have the role of protecting the tribe from invading tribes or of accumulating resources to win the love of high value men, so their intrasexual strategy doesn’t require cooperativeness, but since men are attracted to young nubile women and are thus a persistent abandonment threat to women, the female intrasexual strategy does require competing against other women to retain a male provider.
Ominously, because other younger women are a continual poaching threat, women will seek to eliminate them from competition rather than dominate them.
Intrasexual female domination is useless from a Darwinian perspective because men aren’t attracted to dominant women (they’re attracted to sexy fertile women).
We confirmed a puzzling gender difference: men cooperate much more than women.
. . . . .
They also reported that men paired with men cooperate almost twice as frequently as women paired with women. Our conceptual replication with Prisoner’s Dilemmas repeated over 300 rounds with no breaks, using more advanced, computerized methodology, revealed no decline in cooperation, apart from endgame effects in the last few rounds, and replicated the substantial gender difference, confirming, in the UK, a puzzling finding first reported in the US in the 1960s.
Remember Abby Nierman? She #MeToo’d like all the wall hitting broads have been doing. Yet Abby was attacked – for #MeTooing – by other women who had #MeToo’d.
Why? Oh why was Abby attacked for #MeTooing? I’m baffled.
#MeToo is a means for old ugly women to get attention. Abby is young and cute. Women hate other women. They especially hate other women who are more attractive (younger and thinner) than them. When Abby tweeted #MeToo she threatened to take some of the attention the old ugly women are getting. Thus they attack her.
Because if only women ran the world everything would be perfect.
Fifty year old wall hitter attacks Abby.
Bonus video I didn’t talk about in the podcast.
Fifty year old wall hitter strikes back.
See the fat bald beta male!
See the fifty year old wall hitter spit venom for being called old and irrelevant!
Hear the wall hitter pretend her “career” as a journalist matters!
Here a woman say women don’t attack other women for how they look!
It doesn’t stop.
Bad dates ARE #MeToo despite what all the wall hitting femistatists say.
Author and former pick-up artist Michael Ellsberg encourages men to reflect on past behavior and examples of questionable sexual behavior, such as the viral story Cat Person, which is written from the perspective of a twenty-year-old woman who goes on a date with a much older man and ends up having an unpleasant sexual experience that was consensual but unwanted. Ellsberg has asked men to pledge to ensure women are mutually interested in initiating a sexual encounter and to slow down if there is ever doubt a woman wants to continue.
Here is a story about a young girl who goes on a bad date with an older man and it’s MEEEEEEEEEEEEETOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
The story follows in third person narrative the brief relationship between Margot and Robert, told from Margot’s point of view. Margot is a 20-year-old college student who works in an independent cinema. Robert is a relatively older man who likes buying Red Vines at the concession stand.  The initial courtship mostly takes place over texting. A review in Slate writes “the story depicts the way texting supplants more organic methods of getting to know someone” allowing the formation of “imaginary constructs” of the other person, which fall apart upon meeting. The story depicts a bad sexual encounter. Slate describes it as a story of “how two people who don’t know or seemingly even really like each other can end up in bed”. Margot later rejects Robert and the story ends on a bitter note.
. . . . .
The Atlantic notes that “The depiction of uncomfortable romance in “Cat Person” seems to resonate with countless women,” and describes it as a “literary adjunct to the latest #MeToo moment.” Personal reactions have been largely, but not entirely, along gender lines (roughly akin to those to Jane Austen), and for many readers, it captures what it is like to be a woman in her twenties in 2017, including “the desperate need to be considered polite and nice at all costs.”
More twitter attacks on Abby from wall hitters and beta cucks!
And finally . . .
No honey. They aren’t attacking you because there is work to be done.
They are attacking you because you are young and thin.
And that makes you dangerous.
Are you gonna spend money on things not related to #MeToo because you have a life? Then spend that money at amazon by using my Amazon affiliate link at cls.link/amazon. I promise you I will buy this Supergirl figurine I don’t need.
Send some commies to Canada. They said they would go if the Trumpenfuhrer was elected President but they are too dumb to figure out Canada is to the north and too poor to get there ’cause they have liberal arts degrees. Commies To Canada.
Bitcoin me bitches and bitchettes. It’s the only crypto-currency that can be used to buy anything.